Categories Courts

NJPMC: CJP Directs AG to Address Detainee Production Non-Compliance; Endorses E-Filing and Commercial Litigation Reforms

ISLAMABAD: Chairing the 56th meeting of the National Judicial Policy-Making Committee (NJPMC), Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Yahya Afridi asked Attorney General Mansoor Usman Awan to formulate a comprehensive mechanism to address instances of non-compliance with the legal requirement of producing detainees before a magistrate within the mandatory 24-hour period.

Referring to the institutional response to emotive cases relating to enforced disappearances, the Chief Justice appreciated the government’s initiative to address the issue. At the previous NJPMC meeting held on October 17, the Attorney General had informed the forum that the matter had almost been resolved through an amendment to Section 11EEEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, which requires the production of a detained person before a magistrate within 24 hours. He also assured that a comprehensive mechanism to redress complaints of non-compliance was being considered by the government and would be presented to the committee.

On Saturday, the NJPMC deliberated on key policy issues while reviewing the implementation status of decisions taken in its 55th meeting. The committee unanimously reiterated its resolve to strengthen institutional capacity, accelerate access to justice, and ensure efficient and effective justice delivery. The meeting, convened at the Supreme Court building, was attended by the chief justices of all high courts, with the Federal Constitutional Court chief justice present on special invitation.

Commercial Litigation Corridor Reforms

The NJPMC reviewed the recommendations of the Sub-Committee constituted to address protracted litigation and injunctive orders in commercial, revenue, and fiscal cases. The Sub-Committee’s report highlighted key reforms, including the establishment of dedicated benches, curtailment of frivolous litigation, constitution of a screening committee at the FBR level, avoidance of coercive revenue targets for state-owned enterprises, and improvements in tribunal structures. The report was shared with all high courts for input, and the recommendations were unanimously endorsed.

The NJPMC appreciated the endorsement by the high courts and decided to implement the recommendations, directing the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan (LJCP) to share them with the FBR for implementation. The LJCP was also tasked with establishing a mechanism for taxation and revenue case management at each high court on the model of the Supreme Court.

Case Disposal and Model Courts

The committee lauded the disposal of 558,474 cases out of 1,253,425 of specified categories within the notified timeframe during the preceding quarter, calling it reflective of the high courts’ strong commitment. The Lahore High Court was commended for deciding a record 465,455 cases, while the Peshawar High Court was recognised for prioritising inheritance cases and operating a double docket regime.

The NJPMC asked high courts to dispose of the oldest succession cases up to 2019 within 30 days and appreciated the establishment and performance of model trial courts for chronic civil and criminal cases. A special committee was tasked to finalise recommendations on district judiciary reforms within 30 days, with the LHC chief justice directed to convene the reform committee accordingly.

Complaint Redressal and Jail Reforms

The NJPMC lauded high courts for operationalising accessible public forums at high court and district court levels for complaint redressal. Reports of jail reform subcommittees and consolidated action plans had been shared with provincial justice committee chairpersons. Chief justices were instructed to engage with provincial chief secretaries and the Interior Division for legislative, policy, and administrative inputs, with progress to be reviewed in the next meeting.

Digital Transformation and E-Filing

Regarding national guidelines for AI in judicial institutions, the NJPMC decided that the LJCP would circulate the draft guidelines to high courts for feedback within 30 days, after which the final version will be placed before the committee for approval.

The committee also approved immediate initiation of e-filing in all district courts as the first phase of the national e-courts project. High courts were directed to review existing rules, including Schedule I of the CPC, or invoke rule-making powers to enable electronic case filing. The concept of one-window, integrated family and women facilitation centres within judicial complexes was approved in principle, subject to government funding.

Access to Justice Development Fund

High courts were commended for executing projects under the Access to Justice Development Fund, with a stress on optimum utilisation and timely completion. The Lahore and Peshawar high courts were asked to liaise with provincial governments for balance funding to ensure solarisation of courts, with all high courts directed to utilise released funds efficiently.

 

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…