Categories Courts

PCA Rules Against India’s ‘Abeyance’ of IWT

The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has issued an award in favor of Pakistan, ruling India’s declaration to hold the Indus Waters Treaty in “abeyance” does not limit the court’s jurisdiction in the dispute.

“Pakistan remains committed to full implementation of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) ,” the Foreign Office stated, adding it expects India to “immediately resume the normal functioning of the treaty, and faithfully implement the award announced by the Court of Arbitration”.

The ruling reinforces the court’s earlier decision from July 6, 2023, which had already rejected India’s objections and affirmed the court’s authority to hear the dispute. The unanimous and binding decision, a Supplemental Award on Competence, was rendered on June 27, 20251, stated in a press release.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration, established by treaty in 1899, is an intergovernmental organization providing a variety of dispute resolution services to the international community.

Pakistan initiated the arbitration under the Indus Waters Treaty to address India’s construction of certain hydro-electric projects on the tributaries of the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab rivers. In response, India had announced on April 23 and 24, 2025, that the treaty “will be held in abeyance with immediate effect”.

The Court of Arbitration found that a party’s unilateral decision cannot affect its competence after arbitral proceedings have begun. The court’s jurisdiction, once established, cannot be defeated by such an action, and it has a continuing responsibility to advance the proceedings in a timely and fair manner.

The ruling also applies to the competence of a Neutral Expert appointed in separate proceedings between India and Pakistan under the same treaty. The decision is final and without appeal. This award holds special significance following India’s recent actions and is seen as an endorsement of Pakistan’s historical position.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. He holds a Master in Mass Communications and an LLM degree. Contact: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Supreme Court of Pakistan, right to privacy, DNA test ruling, parentage confirmation, paternity dispute Pakistan, Article 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 9 Right to Liberty, human dignity, judicial system Pakistan, Khalid Hameed case, fundamental rights, personal autonomy, bodily integrity, unauthorized medical procedures, sanctity of family life, due process, legal justification for DNA test, inheritance dispute law, Anti-Corruption Court Pakpattan, Lahore High Court revision petition, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, ocietal embarrassment, psychological stigma, privacy rights, protection of women's reputation, moral integrity of the mother, genetic blueprint security, personal data protection, surveillance and disclosure, individual self-determination, Supreme Court ruling on DNA testing without consent, right to privacy under Article 14 Pakistan, legal protection against paternity challenges, impact of mandatory DNA tests on dignity, protection of genetic information in Pakistan law.

SC Bars Compulsory Paternity DNA Test, Citing Protection of Mother’s Character

ISLAMABAD: Affirming the right to privacy, the Supreme Court has set aside a subordinate court’s…

Lahore High Court, LHC Rawalpindi Bench, Justice Jawad Hassan, mediation, Alternate Dispute Resolution Act 2017, Shamsabad land dispute, Ojhri Camp compensation, military land dispute, land acquisition Pakistan, Panorama Shopping Centre, Article 199 Constitution, amicable settlement, land compensation Pakistan, Pakistan Army land dispute, legal mediation Pakistan, court-directed mediation, Pakistan land litigation, landowners dispute, fair market compensation, out-of-court settlement, Defence Ministry land, Pakistan judiciary, civil dispute resolution, structured mediation, Air Defence Command Pakistan, LHC directives, decades-old land dispute, Pakistan legal news

Mediation Mandated: Justice Jawad Hassan Sets Three-Month Deadline in Ojhri Camp Land Case

RAWALPINDI: Mediation – a process in which a mediator facilitates communication and negotiation to help…

Landmark Policy Shift: SC Streamlines Case Fixation for Litigant Accessibility

ISLAMABAD – In a significant move aimed at dramatically enhancing the efficiency of its operations and…