Categories Courts

Petitioner urges IHC to name judge for ATC adjudications

Accusing someone for crime does not seize his fundamental rights in criminal administration of justice as constitutional guarantees have been incorporated through criminal laws to avail bail facility. Surprisingly, once after Judge of the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) Islamabad went on leave for two month – no duty judge is ready to hear bail application of people confined in jail, in absence of a notification of the High Court, empowering him to adjudicate the matters.

Terming delay in issuance of notification as derogation of fundamental right of an accused, legal fraternity has urged the people at helm of affair to issue notification immediately while assigning duties for adjudication in the ATC in order to ensure the constitutional freedoms.

Recently, Advocate High Court Abid Ali invoked jurisdiction of Islamabad High Court (IHC) on behalf of an old lady who is behind the bars in Adyla Jail but her bail application is not being entertained due to the reason that Judge of the ATC is on leave for two months and duty judge is not taking up the matter in absence of notification of name of a judge for the slot.

Abid Ali expressed judicial work of the ATC Islamabad was hampering as concerned department has not notified name of any judge to take charge for two months to adjudicate pending matters.

Appearing before the IHC Chief Justice Aamir Farooq, young lawyer Abid Ali argued as per the National Judicial Policy, 2009 the Courts of Sessions are bound to decide the bail petitions within five days saying in the case in hand petitioner is being unheard/unattended almost from 15 days.

According to facts of the case, local police has nabbed the petitioner under charges of involvement in FIR No. 33/24, under section 365-A, 109, 34 of the Pakistan Penal Code in Polic Station Humak, Islamabad. She was sent to judicial custody for the purpose of identification whereafter the proceedings of identification parade the lady accused was sent to judicial custody on March 26, 2024.

The petitioner has filed post-arrest bail application before Judge Special Court – I, Anti-Terrorism, Islamabad. It has been stated in the petition that the Presiding Officer of the ATC went on leave for two months hence the bail of petitioner was not being entertained on merits since its institution.

Abid Ali, counsel for the petitioner urged the IHC to notify name of a judge or issue directives to any other Judge of Special Court to entertain the bail petition of the petitioner and adjudicate it on merits.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…