Categories Courts

Petitioner urges IHC to name judge for ATC adjudications

Accusing someone for crime does not seize his fundamental rights in criminal administration of justice as constitutional guarantees have been incorporated through criminal laws to avail bail facility. Surprisingly, once after Judge of the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) Islamabad went on leave for two month – no duty judge is ready to hear bail application of people confined in jail, in absence of a notification of the High Court, empowering him to adjudicate the matters.

Terming delay in issuance of notification as derogation of fundamental right of an accused, legal fraternity has urged the people at helm of affair to issue notification immediately while assigning duties for adjudication in the ATC in order to ensure the constitutional freedoms.

Recently, Advocate High Court Abid Ali invoked jurisdiction of Islamabad High Court (IHC) on behalf of an old lady who is behind the bars in Adyla Jail but her bail application is not being entertained due to the reason that Judge of the ATC is on leave for two months and duty judge is not taking up the matter in absence of notification of name of a judge for the slot.

Abid Ali expressed judicial work of the ATC Islamabad was hampering as concerned department has not notified name of any judge to take charge for two months to adjudicate pending matters.

Appearing before the IHC Chief Justice Aamir Farooq, young lawyer Abid Ali argued as per the National Judicial Policy, 2009 the Courts of Sessions are bound to decide the bail petitions within five days saying in the case in hand petitioner is being unheard/unattended almost from 15 days.

According to facts of the case, local police has nabbed the petitioner under charges of involvement in FIR No. 33/24, under section 365-A, 109, 34 of the Pakistan Penal Code in Polic Station Humak, Islamabad. She was sent to judicial custody for the purpose of identification whereafter the proceedings of identification parade the lady accused was sent to judicial custody on March 26, 2024.

The petitioner has filed post-arrest bail application before Judge Special Court – I, Anti-Terrorism, Islamabad. It has been stated in the petition that the Presiding Officer of the ATC went on leave for two months hence the bail of petitioner was not being entertained on merits since its institution.

Abid Ali, counsel for the petitioner urged the IHC to notify name of a judge or issue directives to any other Judge of Special Court to entertain the bail petition of the petitioner and adjudicate it on merits.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. He holds a Master in Mass Communications and an LLM degree. Contact: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Supreme Court of Pakistan, right to privacy, DNA test ruling, parentage confirmation, paternity dispute Pakistan, Article 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 9 Right to Liberty, human dignity, judicial system Pakistan, Khalid Hameed case, fundamental rights, personal autonomy, bodily integrity, unauthorized medical procedures, sanctity of family life, due process, legal justification for DNA test, inheritance dispute law, Anti-Corruption Court Pakpattan, Lahore High Court revision petition, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, ocietal embarrassment, psychological stigma, privacy rights, protection of women's reputation, moral integrity of the mother, genetic blueprint security, personal data protection, surveillance and disclosure, individual self-determination, Supreme Court ruling on DNA testing without consent, right to privacy under Article 14 Pakistan, legal protection against paternity challenges, impact of mandatory DNA tests on dignity, protection of genetic information in Pakistan law.

SC Bars Compulsory Paternity DNA Test, Citing Protection of Mother’s Character

ISLAMABAD: Affirming the right to privacy, the Supreme Court has set aside a subordinate court’s…

Lahore High Court, LHC Rawalpindi Bench, Justice Jawad Hassan, mediation, Alternate Dispute Resolution Act 2017, Shamsabad land dispute, Ojhri Camp compensation, military land dispute, land acquisition Pakistan, Panorama Shopping Centre, Article 199 Constitution, amicable settlement, land compensation Pakistan, Pakistan Army land dispute, legal mediation Pakistan, court-directed mediation, Pakistan land litigation, landowners dispute, fair market compensation, out-of-court settlement, Defence Ministry land, Pakistan judiciary, civil dispute resolution, structured mediation, Air Defence Command Pakistan, LHC directives, decades-old land dispute, Pakistan legal news

Mediation Mandated: Justice Jawad Hassan Sets Three-Month Deadline in Ojhri Camp Land Case

RAWALPINDI: Mediation – a process in which a mediator facilitates communication and negotiation to help…

Landmark Policy Shift: SC Streamlines Case Fixation for Litigant Accessibility

ISLAMABAD – In a significant move aimed at dramatically enhancing the efficiency of its operations and…