Categories Courts

PHC Stays Appointments of Opposition Leaders in NA, Senate – Seeks Govt Reply

A  division bench of the Peshawar High Court granted stay order to prevent the filling of opposition leader slots in the Parliament.

The directives were issued on Tuesday while the court was hearing pleas challenging disqualificaiton notificaitons of the Election Commission of Pakistan through which Opposition Leader in the National Assembly Omar Ayub and Senator Shibli Faraz were ousted in consequence of conviction in May 9 cases. The court has also sought a comprehensive response from Speaker of the National Assembly, the Chairperson of the Senate, and other respondents by August 15.

On August 5, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) had disqualified Ayub and Faraz, along with other opposition MNAs and MPAs, following their convictions in three cases related to the May 9, 2023 riots.

Subsequently, on August 8, both leaders were removed from their posts via notifications issued by the NA and Senate secretariats. A two-member bench comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Dr Khurshid Iqbal heard petitions filed by both leaders against their de-notification by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

During the hearing, Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, representing the petitioners, argued that the ECP had disqualified the two leaders without receiving a reference from the NA speaker or Senate chairperson, terming it a constitutional overreach.

“ECP acted without authority, until a reference is sent by the speaker, it has no power to disqualify a member,” Gohar argued saying opposition leadership is a constitutional position and, under Assembly rules, cannot be removed through unilateral action by the ECP. Gohar cited a top court ruling to substantiate his argument that the ECP has nothing to do with once a candidate becomes an elected member.

Speaking to media persons outside the court, Barrister Gohar termed the current wave of disqualifications and punishments would not resolve political issues. “Everyone may have made mistakes, but the solution lies in dialogue, not disqualification,” he claimed.

“If the country’s largest party is sidelined, it poses serious risks to democracy.” Gohar also highlighted what he called discriminatory treatment of the PTI, stating that the ECP accepted the intra-party elections of other parties but rejected PTI’s, despite them being conducted in a more transparent manner. He further said that PTI, having won as many s 180 seats in the February 8 general elections, had now been reduced to 76 seats in the Assembly, alleging political victimisation.

Later, the bench adjourned hearing of the matter till August 15.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…