Categories Courts

PIC directs ICT excise department to release details of confiscated NCP vehicles

Pakistan Information Commission (PIC) granted a week to Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) Excise and Taxation department with directives to provide information to an applicant, seeking details over confiscated Non-Custom Paid (NCP) vehicles since 2020 amid officials detail who are using these automobiles.

The Right of Access to Information Act 2017 promotes transparency and efficiency of public bodies under the sense of accountability in case there is misuse of power. However, some public bodies are still at large, one of them is Excise and Taxation department of the ICT where people at the helm of affairs are not ready to take ownership of the Act.

Consequently, a two-member panel of the PIC comprising Chief Information Commissioner Mohammad Azam and Information Commissioner Zahid Abdullah recently granted a week to ICT’s Excise and Taxation department to provide required information to an information seeker Nadeem Umer.

The factual story revealed that in May 25, 2022, an information seeker, Nadeem Umer has submitted an information request under the Right of Access to Information Act 2017 to Directorate of the ICT Excise and Taxation.  

Umer has filed application before the ICT’ Excise and Taxation office, seeking details of the NCP vehicles, confiscated from January 2020 till filing of the application along with the details of the make, model and places name from where vehicles were seized.

He also requested to provide information categorically list of the NCP vehicles including description in term of make, official name and designation who are using the same, department of the officer using the vehicle/s, date from which the vehicle is provided to official department. Umer also requested to provide list of the NCP vehicles which have been requisitioned by the Excise Office to the Chief Commissioner ICT, Deputy Commissioner ICT, and other offices of the ICT.

Upon reluctance of the public body in providing the required information, the information seeker invoked jurisdiction of the PIC filing appeal against the Excise and Taxation office ICT on June 16,2022 in the matter.

Taking up the matter, a two- member panel of the PIC comprising Chief Information Commissioner Mohammad Azam and Information Commissioner Zahid Abdullah issued notice to director of the Excise and Taxation ICT on July 04,2022 saying under Section 14 of the Right of Access to Information Act 2017, each federal public body is bound to respond to a request as soon as possible and in any case within ten working days of receipt of the request.

After enclosing copy of the application of the information seeker for required information in the matter, the PIC issued directives to the respondent (director of the Excise and Taxation ICT) to provide reasons in writing within 07 working days of the receipt of the notice as to why the requested information has not been provided to the applicant.

The PIC fixed information seeker’s appeal for hearing on August 23, 2022 as both the parties were informed through notices on August 02, 2022. However, no one appeared before the Commission to represent the respondent in the hearing held on August 23, 2022.

Providing another opportunity to the director Excise and Taxation ICT, the PIC fixed hearing of the matter on September 13, 2022 and September 27, 2022 respectively. To which one Mr. Asif Jahangir Khan, Inspector, Directorate of Excise and Taxation appeared and sought time to provide requested information in the matter. However, no one from Excise and Taxation Department ICT appeared before the Commission to represent and submit response in the hearing on October 04, 2022.

After providing ample opportunity to director of the ICT Excise and Taxation department, the PIC allowed appeal of the information seeker, issuing directives to the director of the Excise and Taxation is directed to provide the required information at the earliest but not later than 07 working days.

The PIC also asked to the director of the ICT Excise and Taxation department to notify Public Information Officer, (PIO) and upload his contact details on the department’s web site and submit compliance report to the commission within 10 working days.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…