Categories Courts

President upholds major penalty upon woman harasser

President Dr Arif Alvi Saturday upheld Askari Bank Limited (ABL) Departmental Harassment Committee and Federal Ombudsman for Protection against Harassment of Women at Workplace (FOSPAH) decision awarding major penalty of “dismissal from service” imposed upon a bank manager after he was found guilty of the charges of sexually harassing a female colleague at workplace.

The President rejected representation filed by Muhammad Munir Akhtar (the accused), a former employee of the ABL, against decision of the FOSPAH saying the incidents narrated in the complaint against the accused, when juxtaposed with the evidence, established the guilt of the accused for the charges of harassment, the President Secretariat Press Wing said in a press release on Saturday.
In his decision, he observed that the accused had duly admitted the allegations about calls, text messages, and denial to hand over her ATM card to the complainant deliberately. President Alvi said that the accused had admitted that he called and sent messages to the complainant and did not give her ATM card due to the reasons best known to him despite the fact that he was required to hand it over to the complainant. “Facts admitted need not be proved”, he added.
As per details, a female employee of ABL (the complainant) had filed a harassment complaint under section 8 of the Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act 2010 against the accused within the departmental hierarchy of ABL stating that she was harassed by the branch staff of the ABL, Hassanabdal. According to her, the accused Muhammad Munir Akhtar, Bank Manager along with his friend had made it difficult for her to work in the branch by creating an offensive workplace environment.
She alleged that the accused had forced her to go with his friend and after she was transferred to another branch, when she went to collect her card from the Hassanabdal branch, she was verbally abused by the accused and he refused to hand over her ATM card.
The Departmental Harassment Committee probed into her allegations and, after inquiry, concluded that the accused was involved in harassment and was accordingly dismissed from service.
The accused filed an appeal with FOSPAH, which was dismissed, after which, he filed a representation with the president.
President Alvi wrote that workplace harassment could have very serious consequences for the women who experience it as a harassed woman risked losing her job or the chance for a promotion, if she refused to give in to the unethical demands of someone in authority.
“The unwelcome conduct of co-workers makes the working conditions hostile and unpleasant, putting indirect pressure on her to leave the job”, he added. He remarked that sometimes a woman employee was so traumatized by the harassment that she suffered serious emotional and physical consequences and became unable to perform her job properly.
“The workplace harassment has a cumulative and demoralizing effect that discourages women from asserting themselves within the workplace while among men”, he concluded.
The president highlighted that the main objective of the Protection against Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2010 was to create a safe working environment for women, free of harassment, abuse and intimidation with a view toward fulfillment of their right to work with dignity. “Harassment is one of the biggest hurdles faced by working women preventing many who want to work to get themselves and their families out of poverty”, he stated.
President Alvi underscored that the Act was built on the principles of equal opportunity for men and women and their right to earn a livelihood without fear of discrimination as stipulated in the Constitution. He held that the Act also adhered to the principles of Islam and all other religions in our country which assure women’s dignity. The president concluded that there seemed to be no reason for the complainant to file a false complaint against the accused when there existed no previous grudge, ill-will or malice.

 

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…