Categories Courts

SC asks PST to reconsider acquitted public servant case

Accepting plea of a public servant who failed to exercise right of appeal against termination of service within specified period due to incarceration, the top court asked Punjab Service Tribunal to reconsider the matter.

A three-member bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan remanded the case to the Punjab Service Tribunal (PST) underscoring importance of fair consideration of all relevant circumstances before deciding on the dismissal of such appeals based solely on time limits.

In a recent ruling, copy of which available with TLTP, the bench mentioned challenging circumstances as the petitioner was unable to pursue a departmental appeal due to his incarceration under frivolous criminal charges in August 30,2010. After five years he was granted bail on August 25, 2015. Later, the petitioner was acquitted on February 25, 2015.

After his arrest, Multan police issued a show-cause notice against the petitioner on November 25, 2010, on the grounds of absence from duty without leave, and was dismissed on January 11, 2011, while he was behind bars. “The Superintendent of Police Headquarters, Multan, vide order dated 11.01.2011, awarded him with the major penalty of dismissal from service by means of an ex-parte order, stated in the SC verdict.

The Bench ruled that given his incarceration, the petitioner was not in a position to diligently follow up on the appeal process, which would have otherwise been his right under service laws. The Bench further noted that while a departmental appeal could have been filed through the jail superintendent, the petitioner never received the dismissal order while in jail, meaning the delay was not attributable to him.

The ruling stressed that civil servants must be treated fairly, and it is the duty of the Service Tribunal to consider all facts judiciously when it comes to terms and conditions of service. The Bench ruled that the petitioner, being a victim of circumstances, could not be held responsible for the delay in filing the appeal.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner - Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad-Pakistan. Founder  ‘The Law Today Pakistan’ (TLTP) Newswire Service. Teaches Jurisprudence, International law, Civil and Criminal law.  Can be reached at mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Justice Retired Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, Justice Retired Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, National Industrial Relations Commission, NIRC, Justice Retired Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, video link hearings, labour justice in Pakistan, industrial disputes, employer and workman rights, digital courts, online hearings Pakistan, labour court reforms, labour law Pakistan, Industrial Relations Act 2012, virtual courtrooms, legal innovation Pakistan, access to justice, remote hearings, federal labour court, trans-provincial jurisdiction, trade union rights, collective bargaining, unfair labour practices, judicial reforms Pakistan, Arbab Amjad, legal technology Pakistan, justice delivery system, court digitalisation, legal fraternity Pakistan, workplace dispute resolution, Chairman NIRC reforms, justice without delay

Fast-Track Labour Cases: NIRC Video Link Now Live Nationwide

In a groundbreaking move to modernize the delivery of justice in resolving industrial disputes between…

International Federation of Journalists, IFJ, PECA Pakistan, Supreme Court Pakistan, press freedom, journalist safety, Digital Rights Protection Authority, PECA Amendment 2025, FIA powers under PECA, online content regulation, media freedom Pakistan, freedom of expression, censorship in Pakistan, PFUJ, FIA Cybercrime Wing, Article 19 Constitution Pakistan, threats to journalists, journalist harassment, media union rights, Pakistan digital laws, cybercrime law, suppression of dissent, Islamabad High Court petition, media workers rights, journalist killings Pakistan, press freedom violations Pakistan, PECA judicial review

IFJ Urges SC to Examine Constitutionality of PECA, Terming It a Threat to Press Freedom

Global body of journalists ‘International Federation of Journalists’ (IFJ) urged Supreme Court of Pakistan to…

CCP, Competition Commission of Pakistan, cartel penalties, deceptive advertising, urea price fixing, poultry cartel, false advertising, misleading marketing, Section 10(2) Competition Act, FMPAC, fertilizer cartel, Kingdom Valley fine, Unilever Lifebuoy, Friesland Campina Engro, Hyundai Tucson ad, Al-Ghazi Tractors fuel claims, 3N Lifemed fake certification, Diamond Paints ad fine, British Lyceum ad penalty, anti-competitive practices, cartel crackdown, CCP enforcement, CAT Pakistan, consumer protection Pakistan, fair market competition, Dr. Kabir Sidhu CCP

CCP Imposes Rs1 Billion in Penalties on Cartels and Deceptive Advertisers

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) issued 12 major orders during FY 2024-25, imposing penalties…