Categories Courts

SC asks PST to reconsider acquitted public servant case

Accepting plea of a public servant who failed to exercise right of appeal against termination of service within specified period due to incarceration, the top court asked Punjab Service Tribunal to reconsider the matter.

A three-member bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan remanded the case to the Punjab Service Tribunal (PST) underscoring importance of fair consideration of all relevant circumstances before deciding on the dismissal of such appeals based solely on time limits.

In a recent ruling, copy of which available with TLTP, the bench mentioned challenging circumstances as the petitioner was unable to pursue a departmental appeal due to his incarceration under frivolous criminal charges in August 30,2010. After five years he was granted bail on August 25, 2015. Later, the petitioner was acquitted on February 25, 2015.

After his arrest, Multan police issued a show-cause notice against the petitioner on November 25, 2010, on the grounds of absence from duty without leave, and was dismissed on January 11, 2011, while he was behind bars. “The Superintendent of Police Headquarters, Multan, vide order dated 11.01.2011, awarded him with the major penalty of dismissal from service by means of an ex-parte order, stated in the SC verdict.

The Bench ruled that given his incarceration, the petitioner was not in a position to diligently follow up on the appeal process, which would have otherwise been his right under service laws. The Bench further noted that while a departmental appeal could have been filed through the jail superintendent, the petitioner never received the dismissal order while in jail, meaning the delay was not attributable to him.

The ruling stressed that civil servants must be treated fairly, and it is the duty of the Service Tribunal to consider all facts judiciously when it comes to terms and conditions of service. The Bench ruled that the petitioner, being a victim of circumstances, could not be held responsible for the delay in filing the appeal.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…