Categories Courts

SC forms panel for internal workflow

A three-member committee of sitting justices of top court has been formed to make arrangements for its internal working. The committee is constituted under Section 2 of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023 for the formation of benches and scheduling of the cases filed under Article 184(3) of the Constitution.

Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Justice Qazi Faez Isa is chairman of the committee while Justice Sardar Tariq Masood and Justice Ijazul Ahsan are its other members whereas top court Registrar Jazeela Aslam will perform duties as secretary of the committee.

According to minutes of an earlier meeting on October 25, the Supreme Court (SC) Registrar would have to draft procedure of the committee in order to furnish before the Chairman. The CJP may amend it and then share it with the other members for their consideration. “Till the approval of the procedure by the committee and subject to the chairman’s availability, [the] meetings of the committee will be held on Thursdays at 4pm in the chamber of the Chief Justice,” the minutes read.

Two regular benches, comprising three judges each, shall hear pending civil and criminal cases in chronological order (that is, those filed first shall be taken up first). Criminal appeals and jail petitions will be assigned before a Justice Masood-led bench that would also include Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Ayesha Malik.

Civil appeals will be listed before the regular bench led by Justice Munib Akhtar. This bench will also include Justice Shahid Waheed and Justice Musarrat Hilali. These benches will continue till this year’s winter vacations. The larger and special benches will be listed at 11:30am.

On the days these cases are scheduled, a fewer number of trials will be assigned before the benches which include judges on these larger and special benches. The reason for this is because they will be hearing cases in regular benches till 11am.

It has been decided the SC Registrar will determine maintainability of the pleas which have nothing to do with interpretation of Constitution and filed under Article 184(3) of the Constitution.  Whereas the pleas filed under Article 184(3) that did involve interpretation of the Constitution will be placed before the committee.

If chamber appeals are filed in the cases that are determined by the Registrar to be not maintainable, they will assigned for a chamber hearing as per the directions of the CJP. It was also decided that appeals filed under Section 5(1) of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023 were required to be fixed in a court within 14 days before a larger bench.

“Such larger bench will be proposed by the Registrar/secretary for the Chief Justice’s order, which will be sent to the other Hon’ble members of the committee for their approval or alternative suggestion,” the minutes read.

“The 14 days with regard to two appeals arising out of a decision under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, relating to National Accountability Bureau (NAB) amendments, expires on 31 October 2023, therefore, these [should] be fixed in [a] court before [a] bench headed by [the] Chief Justice and other judges as determined by Chief Justice,” the document added.

As for the affirmation of facts on oath in civil cases, advocates-on-record (AORs) are required to verify petitions and appeals. “Some AORs state that they are required to verify the facts of civil petitions and civil appeals even though they do not know the facts of the case,” the document read.

It continued that the committee considered the matter and was of the opinion that since AORs did not have personal knowledge of the facts of such cases, it might not be appropriate to hold them responsible for any misstatement.

“Order VI, Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 provides the mode and manner of verification, which all advocates know of, therefore, all civil petitions, constitutional petitions and appeals be verified in like manner by the petitioner/appellant or by such party’s duly constituted attorney. If a false statement or misstatement is made in the said pleadings those making it will be held responsible,” it added.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…