Categories Courts

SC grants two weeks to Sindh to argue in Daniel Pearl murder case

The Supreme Court Wednesday accepted the application of the prosecutor general Sindh while granting two weeks’ time for arguments in Daniel Pearl murder case.

A three-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Mushir Alam is hearing a review petition in the matter as prosecutor general Sindh sought more time to deliver arguments against release of Omar Saeed Sheikh and other suspects.

It is pertinent to mention that United States has expressed ‘deep concerns’ over the acquittal of the accused in the Daniel Pearl murder case, asking the government to review its legal options.

On March 25 the top court has resumed hearing of Sindh government’s petition involving Ahmed Omer Saeed Sheikh, the principal accused in the murder of Wall Street Journal journalist Daniel Pearl.

A three-judge Supreme Court bench consisting of Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah and Justice Munib Akhtar will take up the Sindh government’s application against the Dec 24, 2020, order of the Sindh High Court (SHC) declaring as illegal the June 29, 2020, provincial government notification of placing all the accused on the IV Schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) of 1997, pursuant to Section 11EE, with an observation that none of the accused was “enemy aliens” as contemplated under Article 10(9) of the Constitution and as such their detention under this provision was found to be illegal and unlawful.

Appearing before the three-member bench of Justice Mushir Alam on Wednesday, Sindh prosecutor general requested the court to grant him time on the grounds that he was unable to deliver more arguments in the case owing to some work-related engagements.

A member of the bench Justice Sardar Tariq Masood observed saying more relief could not be given in the matter in hand as it was a review petition. Later, accepting the prosecutor general Sindh application the bench adjourned hearing of the matter for two weeks.

It is pertinent to mention that during last week, the top court has issued notice to the Sindh government over a complaint of Daniel Pearl murder case accused with regard to lack of facilities in detention. “Accused persons Salman Saqib and others have complained that they were not being provided medical and other facilities at the apartment in which they have been detained,” the counsel of the accused persons contended before the court.

Earlier, a three-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial heard the plea saying, “We are issuing a notice to the government over the complaint,”.

“Ahmed Omer Saeed Sheikh is not being allowed movement in the apartment”, defence counsel Mehmood A. Shaikh said. Whereas Additional Advocate General Punjab Faisal Chaudhry assured the court that the movement ban on Ahmed Omer Shaikh will be relieved. Sheikh’s counsel further said that his client was only permitted to meet his wife and son, while his mother-in-law, uncle and aunt were not being allowed to visit him. Likewise, the Attorney General for Pakistan assured permission to the mentioned relatives of Ahmed Omer Sheikh.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…