Categories Courts

SC has to interpret law rather making the law : CJP

While hearing a suo motu case pertaining to top investigation agency’s harassment of journalists Tuesday Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa observed the court was meant to interpret law instead of enacting legislation saying the court would be unable to provide remedy in absence of any relevant law.

He was heading a three-judge bench, comprising Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Musarat Hilali for hearing the matter saying he only follow the Constitution and law of the land. During proceedings, Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) apprised the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) was mixing criticism with trolling.

The CJP observed the court could interpret law but it could not enact a law. “What we can do when there is no law,” he said, adding the court could only request the stakeholders to sit together. “We follow the Constitution and the law. Criticism doesn’t matter to us.” A member of the bench Justice Mazhar remarked there was no law to regulate social media. “No regulatory laws apply to social media,” he said.

Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) informed the FIA had assured that the process of issuing notices to journalists would be delayed until general elections. The AGP reiterated his earlier statement to the court on Monday that no action would be taken against journalists. The court sought report about the investigation into the attack on journalist Absar Alam. It also allowed the PFUJ to become a party to the case. The court further said that the Press Association of the Supreme Court (PAS) could file an application if it wanted to do so.

Journalist organisations requested the court to suspend the FIA notices. However, the CJP responded saying the court had not examine any notice yet; adding that if something came in writing through civil miscellaneous application then the court could proceed. A journalist told the bench that attempts were being made to control the media before the elections. To which the CJP asked the journalist to place his plea through writing. Later, the hearing was adjourned till first week of March.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner - Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad-Pakistan. Founder  ‘The Law Today Pakistan’ (TLTP) Newswire Service. Teaches Jurisprudence, International law, Civil and Criminal law.  Can be reached at mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

US Court Approves Stay Applications of ICC-Affiliated Law Professors who Challenge Trump Order

Granting stay order in response to plea of two law professors, Federal District Court for…

ATC Jails Senior PTI Leaders for 10 Years; Party Mulls Appeal, House Boycott

Anti-Terrorism Court Faisalabad on Thursday awarded sentence to a group of senior leaders from former…

Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi, Omar Ayub Khan, May 9 trials, procedural violations, Anti-Terrorism Courts, judicial inquiry, political persecution, prosecutorial misconduct, Supreme Court Peshawar Registry, unfair trials Pakistan, justice for all, rushed trials, human rights, legal transparency, judicial accountability, Pakistan opposition letter, CJP meeting opposition leader, May 9 suspects, media access trials, legal reform Pakistan, Supreme Court of Pakistan, due process violations, judicial independence, legal system Pakistan

CJP to Meet Omar Ayub Over Alleged Procedural Lacunas in May 9 Trials

Days after Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly, Omar Ayub Khan, wrote a…