Categories Courts

SC has to interpret law rather making the law : CJP

While hearing a suo motu case pertaining to top investigation agency’s harassment of journalists Tuesday Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa observed the court was meant to interpret law instead of enacting legislation saying the court would be unable to provide remedy in absence of any relevant law.

He was heading a three-judge bench, comprising Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Musarat Hilali for hearing the matter saying he only follow the Constitution and law of the land. During proceedings, Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) apprised the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) was mixing criticism with trolling.

The CJP observed the court could interpret law but it could not enact a law. “What we can do when there is no law,” he said, adding the court could only request the stakeholders to sit together. “We follow the Constitution and the law. Criticism doesn’t matter to us.” A member of the bench Justice Mazhar remarked there was no law to regulate social media. “No regulatory laws apply to social media,” he said.

Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) informed the FIA had assured that the process of issuing notices to journalists would be delayed until general elections. The AGP reiterated his earlier statement to the court on Monday that no action would be taken against journalists. The court sought report about the investigation into the attack on journalist Absar Alam. It also allowed the PFUJ to become a party to the case. The court further said that the Press Association of the Supreme Court (PAS) could file an application if it wanted to do so.

Journalist organisations requested the court to suspend the FIA notices. However, the CJP responded saying the court had not examine any notice yet; adding that if something came in writing through civil miscellaneous application then the court could proceed. A journalist told the bench that attempts were being made to control the media before the elections. To which the CJP asked the journalist to place his plea through writing. Later, the hearing was adjourned till first week of March.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, and Civil and Criminal Law. Contact: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Punjab Judicial Academy, Justice Aalia Neelum, Lahore High Court, PJA Board Meeting, first female Chairperson PJA, judicial training Punjab, judicial reforms Pakistan, Punjab Judicial Academy Act 2007, Section 4 PJA Act, judicial officers training, court personnel training, court management training, case management Punjab, delay reduction techniques, alternate dispute resolution training, judgment writing training, judicial administration Punjab, legal education Pakistan, Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Justice Jawad Hassan, Amjad Iqbal Ranjha, Lahore news, judicial capacity building, Federal Judicial Academy collaboration, legal research Punjab, judicial ethics training, law and development Punjab, legislative drafting training, PJA conferences seminars workshops.

Chief Justice LHC Justice Miss Aalia Neelum Chairs PJA Board Meeting, Marks Historic First for Academy

LAHORE – Days ago the Punjab Judicial Academy marked a significant milestone when Chief Justice…

Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), 27th Constitutional Amendment, FCC commences operations, judicial arena, Islamabad High Court (IHC), FCC judges oath-taking, Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Justice Arshad Hussain Shah, Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan, courtrooms arranged, logistical issues, teething problems, IHC Courtroom No. 2, Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, FCC high-profile cases, amenity plots case, Sindh High Court (SHC) judgment stayed, Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC), public-interest case, IHC relocation, Red Zone difficulties, Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, superior judiciary Pakistan, structural change judicial framework.

Federal Constitutional Court Opens in IHC Building, Ushering in New Post-27th Amendment Judicial Order

ISLAMABAD – The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) finally commenced operations on Monday, marking the first…

Lahore High Court, 27th Constitutional Amendment, challenged, judicial independence, Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Munir Ahmed, Mian Shabbir Ismail, basic structure violation, Supreme Court original jurisdiction, Federal Constitutional Court, abolition of Supreme Court powers, 1973 Constitution, judicial history distortion, compromise of judiciary, legislative transparency, lack of public debate, void amendment, stay on implementation.

Constitutionality of 27th Amendment Challenged in LHC

LAHORE – Invoking jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court – petitioners challenged legality of the…