Categories Courts

SC seeks reply from govt in pleas challenging student’ unions ban

A six-member constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on Monday sought responses from the federal and provincial governments regarding petitions seeking restoration of student unions in universities, aimed at fostering future political leadership and strengthening grassroots democracy.

The six-member constitutional bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justice Amin ud Din Khan, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Musarrat Hilali and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan is hearing the pleas. The bench sought comprehensive response from respondents in the matter after hearing arguments against ban on students of universities to form association and anion and indulging in politics.

Advocate Supreme Court Umer Ijaz Gilani is the counsel for students Hamza Muhammad Khawaja, Moazzam Riaz, Muhammad Daniyal Abdullah, Ummama Tariq Awan in the matter. Besides, Muhammad Usama Amir, General Secretary, Islami Jamiat Talaba Pakistan has also filed the petition.

Gilani argued before the bench saying constitutional provisions ensure guarantees to protect the right of university students to form association or unions, adding such constitutional rights cannot be curtailed. He urged the court to declare the fundamental right of university students to form associations or unions.

During hearing of the matter, members of the bench observed that Quaid-e-Azam University had announced a schedule for holding elections of the students union. It can be a role model for rest of the universities in the country.  At the same time the bench expressed displeasure over involvement of professional associations in active politics. A member of the bench Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi observed that students’ union introduced violence in the Universities. Student unions are meant for welfare of student and not for politics. Justice Musarrat Hilali remarked that politics in our country have generally become aggressive.

After brief hearing of the matter, the bench sought detailed response from the respondents and issued notices to Justice  Secretaries of Federal Education and Professional Training, Ministry of Law and Justice, Chairman Higher Education Commission, Secretaries of the Higher Education Department Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Punjab. Later, hearing was adjourned till date in office.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…