Categories Courts

SC seeks reply from govt in pleas challenging student’ unions ban

A six-member constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on Monday sought responses from the federal and provincial governments regarding petitions seeking restoration of student unions in universities, aimed at fostering future political leadership and strengthening grassroots democracy.

The six-member constitutional bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justice Amin ud Din Khan, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Musarrat Hilali and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan is hearing the pleas. The bench sought comprehensive response from respondents in the matter after hearing arguments against ban on students of universities to form association and anion and indulging in politics.

Advocate Supreme Court Umer Ijaz Gilani is the counsel for students Hamza Muhammad Khawaja, Moazzam Riaz, Muhammad Daniyal Abdullah, Ummama Tariq Awan in the matter. Besides, Muhammad Usama Amir, General Secretary, Islami Jamiat Talaba Pakistan has also filed the petition.

Gilani argued before the bench saying constitutional provisions ensure guarantees to protect the right of university students to form association or unions, adding such constitutional rights cannot be curtailed. He urged the court to declare the fundamental right of university students to form associations or unions.

During hearing of the matter, members of the bench observed that Quaid-e-Azam University had announced a schedule for holding elections of the students union. It can be a role model for rest of the universities in the country.  At the same time the bench expressed displeasure over involvement of professional associations in active politics. A member of the bench Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi observed that students’ union introduced violence in the Universities. Student unions are meant for welfare of student and not for politics. Justice Musarrat Hilali remarked that politics in our country have generally become aggressive.

After brief hearing of the matter, the bench sought detailed response from the respondents and issued notices to Justice  Secretaries of Federal Education and Professional Training, Ministry of Law and Justice, Chairman Higher Education Commission, Secretaries of the Higher Education Department Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Punjab. Later, hearing was adjourned till date in office.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, and Civil and Criminal Law. Contact: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Punjab Judicial Academy, Justice Aalia Neelum, Lahore High Court, PJA Board Meeting, first female Chairperson PJA, judicial training Punjab, judicial reforms Pakistan, Punjab Judicial Academy Act 2007, Section 4 PJA Act, judicial officers training, court personnel training, court management training, case management Punjab, delay reduction techniques, alternate dispute resolution training, judgment writing training, judicial administration Punjab, legal education Pakistan, Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Justice Jawad Hassan, Amjad Iqbal Ranjha, Lahore news, judicial capacity building, Federal Judicial Academy collaboration, legal research Punjab, judicial ethics training, law and development Punjab, legislative drafting training, PJA conferences seminars workshops.

Chief Justice LHC Justice Miss Aalia Neelum Chairs PJA Board Meeting, Marks Historic First for Academy

LAHORE – Days ago the Punjab Judicial Academy marked a significant milestone when Chief Justice…

Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), 27th Constitutional Amendment, FCC commences operations, judicial arena, Islamabad High Court (IHC), FCC judges oath-taking, Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Justice Arshad Hussain Shah, Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan, courtrooms arranged, logistical issues, teething problems, IHC Courtroom No. 2, Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, FCC high-profile cases, amenity plots case, Sindh High Court (SHC) judgment stayed, Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC), public-interest case, IHC relocation, Red Zone difficulties, Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, superior judiciary Pakistan, structural change judicial framework.

Federal Constitutional Court Opens in IHC Building, Ushering in New Post-27th Amendment Judicial Order

ISLAMABAD – The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) finally commenced operations on Monday, marking the first…

Lahore High Court, 27th Constitutional Amendment, challenged, judicial independence, Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Munir Ahmed, Mian Shabbir Ismail, basic structure violation, Supreme Court original jurisdiction, Federal Constitutional Court, abolition of Supreme Court powers, 1973 Constitution, judicial history distortion, compromise of judiciary, legislative transparency, lack of public debate, void amendment, stay on implementation.

Constitutionality of 27th Amendment Challenged in LHC

LAHORE – Invoking jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court – petitioners challenged legality of the…