Categories Courts

SSGCL working as East India Company subsidy: BHC

The Balochistan High Court (BHC) issued contempt of court notices to secretary energy, chairman and director general (Gas) Ogra and 25 top brass of Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGCL) for willful defiance of court directives over  uninterrupted gas supply, manhandling the applicants and failure to establish consumers grievance redressal mechanism since a long.
The court also suspended operation of a notification from January 2023 till further orders regarding the SSGCL tariff in addition to imposed bar on private contractors of the company from removal of domestic consumer meters without notices, issuing heavy amount provisional bills without conducting meters.
The bench also sought a comprehensive report from MD SSGCL pertaining to reasons why despite having a gas in the main distribution, the inhabitants of the province have been deprived of natural gas supply.
Besides, the court also asked chief secretary and governor Balochistan to take up the issue with the prime minister and the federal cabinet at the earliest to fulfil constitutional obligation under Article 158 which stipulates that the province in which a well-head of natural gas is situated shall have precedence over other parts of Pakistan in meeting the requirements from that well-head, subject to the commitments and obligations as on the commencing day.

“We are unable to comprehend why the officials of public enterprises are running the enterprises as their private business or they are posing themselves as rulers instead of servants of the state and citizens of Pakistan. The afore stated facts, figures and circumstances altogether bring us to a conclusion that the SSGCL is no more left as a state-owned enterprises, rather they are working as a foreign invaders or as a subsidy of the East India Company, who are just looting the citizens of the Pakistan on pretext of revenue collection and financial fixes”, says BHC Justice Mulakhail

A divisional bench of the BHC comprising Justices Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Sardar Ahmed Haleemi issued the directives in response to a plea of Syed Nazir Agha Advocate, seeking court’s intervention for strong institutional arrangements to protect the fundamental rights.
The petitioner has urged the court’s directives to National Highways Authority (NHA), Cantonment Board Quetta (CBQ) and Metropolitan Corporation Quetta (MCQ) to ensure immediate filling up patches and trenches followed by blacktopping soon after handing over the site by the SSGC’s contractor.
Issuing notice in the matter the bench said in its order, “We are dismay to painfully observe, which is unfortunate at least to say, that time and again the orders were passed, but no heed was paid, which left us with no other option, but to issue contempt of court notices to all concerned officers of the SSGC, Ministry of Petroleum, Oil & Gas Development Authority with clear understanding that why a contempt of court proceeding shall not be initiated against them for willful defiance of the court’s orders”.
Expressing grave dismay over referral of domestic consumer bills correction to Karachi office, the bench issued directives to people at the helm of affairs to ensure that such issues should be decided in SSGCL Quetta.

Citing the consumers’ concerns, the bench said in the order, “We are unable to comprehend why the officials of public enterprises are running the enterprises as their private business or they are posing themselves as rulers instead of servants of the state and citizens of Pakistan. The afore stated facts, figures and circumstances altogether bring us to a conclusion that the SSGCL is no more left as a state-owned enterprises, rather they are working as a foreign invaders or as a subsidy of the East India Company, who are just looting the citizens of the Pakistan on pretext of revenue collection and financial fixes”.
The court pointed out in an 11-page order, a copy of which is available with TLTP , “It has been observed with pain and dismay that now this tendency has become a run of the mill that whenever the hearing of this case comes nearer, the gas pressure in the city becomes stable and soon after adjournment of the case and after providing appropriate time to the gas officials to address the issues, the gas supply is either terminated or the pressure is being reduced to the inhabitants till the next date of hearing”.
The court further said, “It has been transpired that certain SSGCL officials are sitting in the gas office with misconception that they are running their private fiefdom and , therefore, the inhabitants of the city are being manhandled, disregarded, disrespected and insulted in front of the gas office and instead of resolving their issues they are being denied their fundamental right and even nobody is ready to resolve their issues”. The hearing was adjourned till May 15.

 

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…