Categories Courts

Suspending internet, phone service imperils country’s functioning : SHC

This is time for digital right activists who are trying to ensure civil liberties in contemporary era as in response to pleas challenging suspension of internet and cellular phone services on the election day on February 8 amid  ban on access to social media platform X, Sindh High Court  issued directives to Pakistan Telecommunication Authority and the federal ministry of interior to file comments in the matter.

Responding query of the Chief Justice of Sindh High Court Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi who was heading a two-member bench as to why internet and cellular phone  services were suspended on the general election day in the country, the PTA counsel counsel disclosed saying the services were suspended on the request of the ministry of interior and other security agencies due to security concerns.

The counsel further submitted the PTA had however asked the cellular phone companies and internet providers to restore the service on February 09. The court observed that the public interest and the system of the country were badly affected due to frequent suspensions of internet and cellular phone services. It observed that the PTA and other government functionaries still did not file replies with regard to the suspension of the internet and cellular phone services on the election day.

It said the country could not be run by suspending the internet or cellular phone services and the situation of the country could not be made better without understanding the ground realities. The bench observed  civilized world would not accept if such a situation was created time and again, adding the federal government was asked to submit reasons for the suspension of internet service during the election day.

The bench observed saying internet service was still affected in the country and the service was being controlled with different tactics. The court observed that prima facie social media platforms were being managed and the names of people causing the disruption would not remain hidden for too long.

However, the PTA counsel submitted that the PTA had not directed any company to suspend or disrupt the cellular or internet service after February 09. Counsel for the petitioners Jibran Nasir made a point arguing the PTA was admitting that it did not shut down the social media site X and it should be ascertained under whose order the social media site was closed down as it was a matter of national security.

The counsel for the PTA said the internet and cellular service was shut down due to national security concerns and reports were filed by federal and provincial governments agencies. The court observed that the internet service can be shut down in specific areas due to a law and order situation, but the entire country could not be deprived of it. It further said social media site X was still shut down and what action had been taken by the PTA if any company was not acting on instructions of the authority.

The SHC had earlier directed the PTA to ensure that there be no further shutting down, disruption or slowing down of the internet service unless there were valid or cogent reasons which shall be intimated to the court on the next date of hearing if such a situation further continued. The court made it clear that if no valid reasons were provided for the continued suspension, disruption or slowing down of the internet service, adverse inference may be drawn against the authorities concerned. The court had also directed the PTA to restore social media site X “if there was no lawful justification or reasonable grounds to deny the internet access to X”.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…