Categories Courts

Suspending internet, phone service imperils country’s functioning : SHC

This is time for digital right activists who are trying to ensure civil liberties in contemporary era as in response to pleas challenging suspension of internet and cellular phone services on the election day on February 8 amid  ban on access to social media platform X, Sindh High Court  issued directives to Pakistan Telecommunication Authority and the federal ministry of interior to file comments in the matter.

Responding query of the Chief Justice of Sindh High Court Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi who was heading a two-member bench as to why internet and cellular phone  services were suspended on the general election day in the country, the PTA counsel counsel disclosed saying the services were suspended on the request of the ministry of interior and other security agencies due to security concerns.

The counsel further submitted the PTA had however asked the cellular phone companies and internet providers to restore the service on February 09. The court observed that the public interest and the system of the country were badly affected due to frequent suspensions of internet and cellular phone services. It observed that the PTA and other government functionaries still did not file replies with regard to the suspension of the internet and cellular phone services on the election day.

It said the country could not be run by suspending the internet or cellular phone services and the situation of the country could not be made better without understanding the ground realities. The bench observed  civilized world would not accept if such a situation was created time and again, adding the federal government was asked to submit reasons for the suspension of internet service during the election day.

The bench observed saying internet service was still affected in the country and the service was being controlled with different tactics. The court observed that prima facie social media platforms were being managed and the names of people causing the disruption would not remain hidden for too long.

However, the PTA counsel submitted that the PTA had not directed any company to suspend or disrupt the cellular or internet service after February 09. Counsel for the petitioners Jibran Nasir made a point arguing the PTA was admitting that it did not shut down the social media site X and it should be ascertained under whose order the social media site was closed down as it was a matter of national security.

The counsel for the PTA said the internet and cellular service was shut down due to national security concerns and reports were filed by federal and provincial governments agencies. The court observed that the internet service can be shut down in specific areas due to a law and order situation, but the entire country could not be deprived of it. It further said social media site X was still shut down and what action had been taken by the PTA if any company was not acting on instructions of the authority.

The SHC had earlier directed the PTA to ensure that there be no further shutting down, disruption or slowing down of the internet service unless there were valid or cogent reasons which shall be intimated to the court on the next date of hearing if such a situation further continued. The court made it clear that if no valid reasons were provided for the continued suspension, disruption or slowing down of the internet service, adverse inference may be drawn against the authorities concerned. The court had also directed the PTA to restore social media site X “if there was no lawful justification or reasonable grounds to deny the internet access to X”.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Islamabad High Court, IHC, Islamabad Local Government elections, local government election petitions, Election Commission of Pakistan, ECP, presidential ordinance, Islamabad Capital Territory, ICT local government, Jamaat-e-Islami, JI, Mohammad Nasrullah Randhawa, Advocate Chaudhry Shoaib Ahmed, local bodies term, constitutional obligation, local government election delay, Islamabad LG polls, ICt Local Government Amendment Ordinance 2026, President Asif Ali Zardari, Articles 17, 32, 89, 140-A, election schedule withdrawal, court adjournment, bench unavailability, deferred hearing, joint petitions, Markazi Muslim League

IHC Adjourns Islamabad LG Election Pleas After Court Roster Cancelled

ISLAMABAD:  A scheduled hearing for the Islamabad Local Government (LG) election petitions was deferred Tuesday…

Khudayar Mohla, Section 4-C, Super Tax Pakistan, Income Tax Ordinance 2001, ITO 2001, Finance Act 2022–23, high-income taxpayers, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR Pakistan, Federal Constitutional Court, FCC Pakistan, government appeals, Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar, constitutional validity, judicial review Pakistan, taxation authority, double taxation, retrospective tax, separation of powers, Pakistan tax law, federal revenue

Levy of Super Tax Within Parliament’s Exclusive Taxing Power, Govt Lawyers Argue Before FCC

ISLAMABAD: A three-member bench of the Chief Justice Federal Constitutional Court Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan is…

Khudayar Mohla, Peshawar High Court, PHC glacial ice case, illegal glacial ice harvesting Pakistan, glacier protection KP, snow transportation ban KP, environmental protection Pakistan, climate change Pakistan courts, Hazara glacier exploitation, Malakand glacier cutting, KP Environmental Protection Agency report, deputy commissioners KP directives, Upper Chitral glacier protection, Swat snow harvesting ban, Mansehra glacier preservation, Upper Dir environmental case, Upper Kurram glaciers, environmental litigation Pakistan, Tariq Afghan petition, PHC environmental orders, glacier conservation Pakistan, biodiversity protection KP, flood risk climate change Pakistan, commercial ice exploitation ban, snowbound districts KP, environmental laws enforcement Pakistan

PHC Directs 6 DCs to Protect Glacial Ice in Snowbound Districts

PESHAWAR: While hearing a petition from environmentalist Tariq Afghan – who sought a government crackdown…