Categories Courts

Turkish citizen invokes jurisdiction of Hyderabad court for son’s custody

While adjudicating over plea of a Turkish father who claimed that his Pakistani wife holding Japanese citizenship has detained an infant baby in connivance with her relatives on Tuesday additional district and sessions judge Sultan Ali Laghari ensured presence of the child in court.

A Turk national Deniz Kizmaz who is running businesses in Japan got married to a Pakistani lady holding Japanese citizenship in Japan a few years ago. In result of the wedlock, two daughters and a baby boy were born. The baby boy was born on March 22, 2021, at Hyderabad.

It is pertinent to mention that both the husband and wife have signed a separation deed in Japan before birth of the baby boy under free consent but under Pakistani law they are still wife and husband.

Appearing before the court on Saturday petitioner’s counsels Advocate High Court Sharafat Ali Chaudhry and Umer Sajjad Chaven apprised the judge that two minor daughters who were born at Istanbul, Turkey are now residing under the care and guardianship and custody of Petitioner (father); whereas the youngest minor son, who was born at Hyderabad, Pakistan, is in illegal custody of relatives of their client’s wife.

The counsels contended before the court saying as their client has been left with no other option except to invoke the jurisdiction of the court for redressal of grievance and recovery of the minor detainee from the illegal and improper custody of the Respondents. The counsels sought court’s directives for recovery of minor from illegal and improper custody of the Deniz Kizmaz’s wife relatives through local police.

The court was also informed that a case of minor custody was under adjudication before a family court Hyderabad saying their client has told them that during an earlier communication mother of the minor has extended threats to Deniz Kizmaz amid demanding a huge amount as visitation charges from Deniz Kizmaz.

Son with Father in Court Room in Hyderabad

Counsels also urged the court to issue directives to the respondents to ensure protection of the minor child and barring them to not travel abroad till final adjudication of a custody suit in the matter. Accepting the habeas corpus plea in the matter, the judge issued directives to station house officer Latifabad police station to recover the detainee from illegal detention of relatives of the Daniez Izmaz’ wife and produce before the court on Tuesday.

On Tuesday, all the respondents appeared before the court, assuring the judge that they will protect the minor whereas Uzay OZTURK, vice-consul Turkish Consulate General in Karachi also remained present in the court during all the proceeding.

After getting assurance that all the respondents will protect the minor life, additional district and session judge Hyderabad disposed of the case with directives to parties to appear before the family court for custody of the child matter.

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…