Categories Courts

Verdict copy downloaded from LHC website is not admissible evidence, Justice Muzamil Akhtar Shabir

While sustaining objection over acceptability of a plea that annexed a verdict downloaded from the Lahore High Court website, a single-member bench of the Court Justice Muzamil Akhtar Shabir ruled only certified copy of the verdict shall be admissible evidence in a case.

The Electronic Transactions Ordinance (TETO),2002 provides legal recognition to electronic signatures. It says that “the requirement under any law for affixation of signatures shall be deemed satisfied where electronic signatures or advanced electronic signatures are applied.”

However, the Ordinance empowers the superior courts to make rules for regulation of their proceedings as mentioned under Section 2 of the law “This Ordinance, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,—(iv) in relation to matters in respect whereof the Supreme Court or the High Courts are empowered to make rules for the regulation of their proceedings, the Supreme Court or High Court, as the case may be”.

Appearing before the bench against Court’s office objection over attachment of the LHC website downloaded copy of judgment, counsel for the petitioner contended that in response to a writ petition 561 of 2022,  judgment of February 24,2022 regarding the plea had been uploaded on the LHC website. The counsel apprised the court that he downloaded the same judgment and attached with the file as annexure but the Court office has raised objection.

In his 7-pages order in the matter, Justice Muzamil Akhtar Shabir said, “The perusal of the afore-referred pages shows that apparently the same comprise of an unsigned copy of judgment passed in the aforementioned case, however, nothing is available on the record to substantiate that the said pages have been downloaded from the official website of this Court and have remained un-altered or un-changed thereafter”.

Justice Shabir further stated in the verdict, “Besides, there is no mechanism available with the office of this Court to verify whether the said copy has been compared with the original judgment/order of this court by any competent authority and is free from errors and omissions so as Diary No. 149609/22 dated 11.10.2022 to be treated as a true and real copy of the judgment actually passed by this Court”.

He said that such a copy has neither been made per se admissible in a court of law as evidence of what has been decided therein through permission granted by the Lahore High Court Rules and Orders nor by any notification issued by this Court in this regard rather the said copies are uploaded subject to all just and legal exceptions and not claimed to be authentic and true copies of the orders actually passed by this Court and free from errors or omissions.

Citing Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, and certain other laws that permit production of certified copies with a presumption that such certified copies are genuine Justice Muzamil Akhtar Shabir  said in the verdict, “yet such presumption of genuineness and correctness is not per se applicable to an unsigned copy of an order or judgment of this Court even if it is stated to be downloaded from the official website of this Court”.

 

Author

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

HSU Advocates, Hassan Sharafat & Umer Advocates, Islamabad Bar Council elections 2025, Islamabad Bar Council, HSU Annual Get Together, Gun and Country Club Islamabad, law firm event Islamabad, Sharafat A Chaudhry, legal fraternity Pakistan, bar politics Pakistan, rule of law Pakistan, Islamabad lawyers, top law firms in Islamabad, legal profession news Pakistan, Bar Council leadership, consultative process Bar Council, democratic values in law, HSU law firm news, professional fellowship lawyers, upcoming Bar Council elections, Khudayar Mohla

HSU Advocates Hosts Annual Get Together Ahead of IBC Elections

HSU Advocates held its Annual Get Together at the Gun and Country Club, Islamabad, in…

NIRC Pakistan, National Industrial Relations Commission, Zubair Khan NIRC, Abdul Qayyum Khan NIRC, Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, Chaudhry Salik Hussain, industrial dispute resolution Pakistan, labour justice Pakistan, video link court hearings, NIRC farewell ceremony, labour law Pakistan, judicial reform Pakistan, industrial harmony Pakistan, prompt justice NIRC, Overseas Pakistanis Ministry, Islamabad legal news, Pakistani trade unions, labour courts Pakistan, workers’ rights Pakistan, Islamabad High Court Bar, labour dispute commission Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

Honouring a Legacy: NIRC Celebrates Service of Zubair Khan and Abdul Qayyum Khan

Speakers at a farewell ceremony on Thursday in honour of two outgoing National Industrial Relations…

Editor, Khudayar Mohla, Farooq Ali case, UK national found dead Islamabad, Farooq Ali murder trial, Dr Rehiana B Ali, suspicious hotel death Pakistan, Islamabad hotel death, postmortem denied by police, FIR 204/22, Section 302 PPC, Section 34 PPC, Islamabad High Court case, forensic investigation failures Pakistan, cover-up by hotel staff, police negligence in murder case, Advocate Sharafat Ali Chaudhry, exhumation report Pakistan, CCTV evidence tampering, Ramada Hotel Islamabad death, private complaint under Section 200 CrPC, justice for Farooq Ali, Pakistani judicial system test, delayed FIR registration, death investigation Pakistan, court verdict May 29 2025, murder cover-up allegations, critical evidence destroyed, criminal justice accountability Pakistan, medico-legal investigation flaws

Verdict Awaited in High-Profile Farooq Ali Murder Case

UK citizen's sister alleges foul play, police cover-up, and forensic mishandling; court to announce judgment…