Categories Courts

Law bars male cop to conduct body search of woman: PHC

While hearing a post arrest bail application on Thursday Justice Ms.Mussarat Hilali of the Peshawar High Court made it clear to police that no cop is allowed to conduct body search of woman accused under any circumstances saying provisions of criminal law only authorize to female police to search body of an accused woman.

A single-member bench of the Justice Mussarat Hilali observed that under the Code of Criminal Procedure, a woman was entitled to ‘special treatment’ regarding body search. “Section 52 of the CrPC provides that whenever it is necessary to cause a woman to be searched, the search should be made by another woman with strict regard to decency.

“Under no circumstances, male police personnel shall actually touch the person of a woman for making search or arrest,” said the Justice Hilali.  The bench made the order while accepting bail application of a woman suspect, who was arrested by the officials of Pishtakhara police station on September 6, 2021, on the charge of narcotics smuggling. The bench granted bail to the applicant subject to furnishing two surety bonds of Rs100,000 each.

After apprehending the accused woman under charges of smuggling heroin the local police registered an FIR under Section 9-D of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Control of Narcotics Substance Act. The police had alleged that they had seen the petitioner stand on the roadside on the Ring Road in Peshawar with a shopping bag in her hand and that the search led to the seizure of 3,280 grammes of heroin in the bag.

Appearing before the bench, counsel for the applicant Umer Zafran contended that his client was falsely implicated in the case saying the applicant was six weeks pregnant and was a mother of three children. He argued that on record, there was no female constable with the police team which claimed of recovering contraband from her possession. He added that the petitioner was arrested on Peshawar’s Ring Road which was a busy public place without a female constable.

The bench observed when the petitioner was searched by police on public road in presence of all male police personnel, the norms of decency could not have been observed. “The raised question how the applicant, who is pregnant of six weeks, was searched on road side where there no prior information of her being involved in trafficking narcotics,” Justice Hilali remarked.

Expressing grave concern over the accused woman custody in male cops for three long hours after arresting her in the matter the bench observed saying, “It has also been noticed with great concern that though the FIR was registered against the petitioner at 1650 hours but she was sent to Women Police Station at 1950 hours after a delay of three hours during which she remained in exclusive male police custody as no female constable is shown to have been associated with the proceedings,”. The bench also pointed out that despite the lapse of 65 days, the prosecution had failed to produce the Forensic Science Laboratory report of the contraband allegedly recovered from the petitioner.

After granting bail to the applicant in the matter, Justice Hilali expressed dismay over police conduct in the case saying the situation was extremely intolerable, undesirable and against the statutory and executive directions.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, FAO, First Appeal, Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, LHC Bahawalpur, Ad Interim Injunction, Temporary Injunction, Stay Application, Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Maintainability, Specific Performance, Balance of Convenience, Balance of Inconvenience, Interlocutory Order, Solar Energy Dispute, On-Grid Solar System, Solar Installation Agreement, Commercial Litigation, Energy Contract Dispute, SS Paper Board Mills, Swift Solar Energy, Civil Judge Rahim Yar Khan, Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan, Sardar Abdul Basit Khan Advocate, Rs 87868000, Daily Loss Rs 250000, Installment Default, Security Cheques, Payment Dispute, Commercial Loss, Shariq Builders 2024 MLD 32, Muhammad Rasab 1998 MLD 2045, Abdullah Sugar Mills 2003 SCMR 1026, Indus Motor Company 2025 CLC 1951, Mst Shazia Mehmood 2025 MLD 1976, Approved for Reporting, FAO No 09 2026 BWP, March 12 2026, Snake Bitten Antidote, Judicial Empathy, 15 Days Directive, Pakistan Court News, Lahore High Court Order 2026, Solar Energy Pakistan, Civil Court Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan Solar Dispute, LHC Order 2026, Pakistan Judiciary News, Court Reporting Pakistan, Legal News Pakistan, High Court Pakistan 2026

“Snake-Bitten May Die Waiting for Antidote” – LHC Disposes Solar Appeal, Orders Trial Court to Decide Stay Application in 15 Days

BAHAWALPUR : A Rahim Yar Khan-based paper and board mill, bleeding Rs. 250,000 daily, invoked…

Khudayar Mohla,Peshawar High Court, PHC ruling, civil courts jurisdiction, load shedding disputes, PESCO load shedding, Kohat load shedding, NEPRA jurisdiction, electricity load shedding Pakistan, PHC verdict, Justice Waqar Ahmad, NEPRA Act 1997, Section 45 NEPRA Act, civil revision petition, Jangal Khel Kohat, prolonged load shedding, 18 hour load shedding, discriminatory load shedding, fundamental rights violation, electricity consumers Pakistan, PESCO administrative policies, Barrister Asadul Mulk, power outages Pakistan, electricity distribution Pakistan, NEPRA regulatory body, special jurisdiction principle, Section 9 CPC, Code of Civil Procedure, Supreme Court precedents Pakistan, electricity complaints Pakistan, power sector regulation, load shedding KPK, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa electricity, consumer rights Pakistan, electricity grievances, NEPRA complaint forum, civil court dismissed, district court Kohat, electricity generation transmission, power distribution policy, judicial intervention electricity, legal jurisdiction electricity, Pakistan power sector, electricity law Pakistan, regulatory authority Pakistan, load shedding schedule, electricity supply company, high court KPK, Pakistan judiciary, electricity policy Pakistan, power outages fundamental rights

PHC Rules Civil Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Load Shedding Disputes

PESHAWAR: While hearing a civil revision petition in a matter relating to prolonged daily load…

AAC Gilgit-Baltistan, GB Awami Action Committee, Advocate Ehsan Ali arrested, AAC leaders arrested, anti-state speeches Gilgit, Iftar party arrest Pakistan, Anti-Terrorism Act Pakistan, ATC remand Gilgit, Rehmat Shah ATC judge, PESCO load shedding, GB Bar Council statement, GB High Court Bar Association, HRCP condemnation, human rights Gilgit-Baltistan, Advocate Nafees arrested, Meher Ali arrested, Engineer Mehboob Wali, FIR anti-terrorism Gilgit, Jutial police station FIR, AAC protest Gilgit, political arrests Pakistan, civil liberties Gilgit-Baltistan, freedom of speech Pakistan, peaceful protest rights Pakistan, anti-terrorism law misuse, GB Supreme Appellate Court Bar Association, legal community Gilgit, rule of law Gilgit-Baltistan, political suppression Pakistan, AAC chairman arrested, Asghar Shah FIR, Masoodur Rehman FIR, Engineer Nadeem FIR, Skardu public outreach, due process Pakistan, fundamental rights Pakistan, political activity restrictions, civil society Gilgit-Baltistan, lawyers arrested Pakistan, advocate illegal detention, bar council demands release, HRCP Pakistan statement, Gilgit police raids, AAC leaders remand, anti-state protest FIR, constitutional rights Pakistan, political dissent Pakistan, GB politics, Gilgit-Baltistan news, Pakistan human rights, legal fraternity Pakistan, ATC physical remand, Khudayar Mohla

Four AAC Leaders Remanded In Gilgit Over Alleged Anti-State Speeches; Bar Council And HRCP Condemn Arrests

GILGIT: In a development that has sent shockwaves through the legal fraternity and civil society…