Categories Courts

Councilors Move PHC Over Discrimination in Fund Allocation

While invoking jurisdiction of Peshawar High Court on Thursday as many as 22 representatives of  local government in various Tehsil councils challenged Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government’s decision to release development funds to 56 of the total 131 Tehsil councils in the province.

They urged the court to issue directives for provincial government to disburse funds impartially for development work in all Tehsils of the province without discrimination under the Provincial Finance Commission allocation.

Filing identical pleas in the matter, Mardan city mayor Himayatullah Mayar, Dir Tehsil council chairman Rafiullah and 20 other Tehsil council mayors and chairmen requested the court to declare illegal the finance department’s Dec 5 order for the release of development funds to 56 councils under the Provincial Finance Commission allocation.

The petitioners requested the court to direct the government to ensure that as per the PFC, an impartial release of funds should be held throughout the province including to the petitioners and other remaining tehsil councils.

They also sought interim relief, saying during pendency of the petition, the respondents including the KP government should be restrained from distribution of funds issued through the impugned order. The government ordered release of funds mostly to Tehsil councils, which have the ruling PTI’s members as mayors and chairmen.

Editor, Peshawar High Court, KP government, Tehsil councils, local government, development funds, Provincial Finance Commission, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Mardan mayor Himayatullah Mayar, Dir Tehsil council chairman Rafiullah, PTI, fiscal transfers, local government finances, KP Local Government Act, 2013, PFC allocation, discrimination in fund distribution, constitutional petition, local government law amendments, public accounts, fiscal year allocation, constitutional violations, Article 140-A, KP Local Government Rules, 2022, interim relief, judicial intervention, local body heads powers, ASC Babar Khan Yousafzi
ASC Babar Khan Yousafzi

Making provincial government through its chief secretary, local government and finance secretaries as respondents  the petitioners submitted saying they were elected as Tehsil council mayors and chairmen in result of local government polls on Dec 19, 2021, and March 31, 2022.

They further submitted that Article 140-A of the Constitution provided that each province should establish a local government system and devolve political, administrative and financial responsibility and authority to the elected representatives of the local government.

The petitioners said that Chapter-VIII of the KP Local Government Act, 2013, related to local government finances and particularly, section 30 provided for establishment of local funds in public accounts, whereas section 31 described the operation of funds and public accounts.

They said that the Act further provided for PFC and fiscal transfers and it was an enactment similar to transfer of funds by the federal government to the provinces under the National Finance Commission. The petitioners claimed that since the elections were held in 2021 and 2022 no funds in respect of PFC and fiscal transfers even had been released for development to tehsil local government.

They added that there were 131 tehsils which had remained deprived of PFC allocation since their elections, but on Dec 5, the impugned order was issued for releasing funds to 56 of the tehsils, whereas remaining 75 had been discriminated against and was not included in the order. The petitioners contended that as per the PFC, the provincial government was obligated to allocate 20 percent of its share to the local government in any fiscal year.

They, however, complained that the government had been withholding those funds for the last three years, while recently, it, through the impugned order, selected 56 of the councils for funding.

The petitioners contended that the KP City and Tehsil Local Government Rules, 2022, empowered mayors and chairmen to manage affairs of their councils, which also included overseeing development within their respective tehsils.

They added that allocation of funds exclusively to selected tehsils of the provincial government’s choice formed discrimination and violated Articles 4, 9 and 25 of the Constitution.

Bench Seek Comments From Respondents :

The Peshawar High Court on Thursday again sought comments from the provincial government about a set of petitions against amendments to the local government law, especially the provisions related to their powers.

A bench comprising Justice Ijaz Anwar and Justice Syed Arshad Ali issued the order while hearing five almost identical petitions filed by heads of several tehsil councils, including Himayatullah Mayar, Peshawar mayor Haji Zubair, Pabbi tehsil council chairman Ghayur Khattak, and other local body heads.

The petitioners requested the court to declare unconstitutional the KP Local Government (Amendment) Act, which was enacted by the provincial government in 2022. The bench wondered if the local government’s representatives didn’t have powers, what tasks they would perform.

Babar Khan Yousafzai, Qazi Jawad Ehsanullah and other lawyers for the petitioners, said the KP Local Government Act, 2013, clearly spelled out the powers and functions of mayors of city councils and chairmen of tehsil council as well as village and neighbourhood councils in the province, but the impugned amendments to the law removed those provisions and declared that the local body heads would exercise and perform such powers and functions as prescribed by the rules.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Islamabad High Court, IHC, Islamabad Local Government elections, local government election petitions, Election Commission of Pakistan, ECP, presidential ordinance, Islamabad Capital Territory, ICT local government, Jamaat-e-Islami, JI, Mohammad Nasrullah Randhawa, Advocate Chaudhry Shoaib Ahmed, local bodies term, constitutional obligation, local government election delay, Islamabad LG polls, ICt Local Government Amendment Ordinance 2026, President Asif Ali Zardari, Articles 17, 32, 89, 140-A, election schedule withdrawal, court adjournment, bench unavailability, deferred hearing, joint petitions, Markazi Muslim League

IHC Adjourns Islamabad LG Election Pleas After Court Roster Cancelled

ISLAMABAD:  A scheduled hearing for the Islamabad Local Government (LG) election petitions was deferred Tuesday…

Khudayar Mohla, Section 4-C, Super Tax Pakistan, Income Tax Ordinance 2001, ITO 2001, Finance Act 2022–23, high-income taxpayers, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR Pakistan, Federal Constitutional Court, FCC Pakistan, government appeals, Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar, constitutional validity, judicial review Pakistan, taxation authority, double taxation, retrospective tax, separation of powers, Pakistan tax law, federal revenue

Levy of Super Tax Within Parliament’s Exclusive Taxing Power, Govt Lawyers Argue Before FCC

ISLAMABAD: A three-member bench of the Chief Justice Federal Constitutional Court Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan is…

Khudayar Mohla, Peshawar High Court, PHC glacial ice case, illegal glacial ice harvesting Pakistan, glacier protection KP, snow transportation ban KP, environmental protection Pakistan, climate change Pakistan courts, Hazara glacier exploitation, Malakand glacier cutting, KP Environmental Protection Agency report, deputy commissioners KP directives, Upper Chitral glacier protection, Swat snow harvesting ban, Mansehra glacier preservation, Upper Dir environmental case, Upper Kurram glaciers, environmental litigation Pakistan, Tariq Afghan petition, PHC environmental orders, glacier conservation Pakistan, biodiversity protection KP, flood risk climate change Pakistan, commercial ice exploitation ban, snowbound districts KP, environmental laws enforcement Pakistan

PHC Directs 6 DCs to Protect Glacial Ice in Snowbound Districts

PESHAWAR: While hearing a petition from environmentalist Tariq Afghan – who sought a government crackdown…