Categories Courts

Govt Notifies Courts Under Lawyers Welfare and Protection Act 2023

While issuing notification subsequent to The Lawyers Welfare and Protection Act 2023 on Saturday government has empowered sub-ordinate courts to adjudicate matters relating to protection of legal fraternity across the country .

Under Section 10 of the Act every incorporated company having more than twenty million paid up capital, autonomous body, corporation or statutory authority shall engage at least one practicing advocate as legal advisor on retainer-ship basis, whereas no advocate shall serve more than three such entities as legal advisor simultaneously.

Likewise Section 11 of the Act is about provision of health facilities to legal fraternity expressing that the government shall notify in relation to all the government, and semi government hospitals, the right to every advocate, his spouse and dependent children for medical treatment at par with the gazetted government officer, subject to presentation of
their official cards and verification by the respective Bar Councils.

The Section 11 of the Act disclosed categorically that the parents, minor children, spouse of the advocate shall also be entitled to the same facilities.

The Ministry of Law and Justice has issued a notification NO.F.40(85)/2024-A. VIII and designated courts in Islamabad and all four provinces. According to the notification, the courts have been designated under the Lawyers Welfare and Protection Act 2023. This decision was made in consultation with the Chief Justices of all the high courts in the country.  The notification further stated that Courts of Additional District & Sessions Judges of Civil Districts and Session Divisions East and West Islamabad in their respective jurisdictions  have been designated to hear cases regarding offences under the Act.

Author

Amna Anwar, Lidia, LLB, IIUI, Islamabad, Advocate Amna Anwar, Editor

The writer is an LLB student and contributes to Law Today. Can be contacted at amnaanwar@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…