Categories Courts

SC asks PST to reconsider acquitted public servant case

Accepting plea of a public servant who failed to exercise right of appeal against termination of service within specified period due to incarceration, the top court asked Punjab Service Tribunal to reconsider the matter.

A three-member bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan remanded the case to the Punjab Service Tribunal (PST) underscoring importance of fair consideration of all relevant circumstances before deciding on the dismissal of such appeals based solely on time limits.

In a recent ruling, copy of which available with TLTP, the bench mentioned challenging circumstances as the petitioner was unable to pursue a departmental appeal due to his incarceration under frivolous criminal charges in August 30,2010. After five years he was granted bail on August 25, 2015. Later, the petitioner was acquitted on February 25, 2015.

After his arrest, Multan police issued a show-cause notice against the petitioner on November 25, 2010, on the grounds of absence from duty without leave, and was dismissed on January 11, 2011, while he was behind bars. “The Superintendent of Police Headquarters, Multan, vide order dated 11.01.2011, awarded him with the major penalty of dismissal from service by means of an ex-parte order, stated in the SC verdict.

The Bench ruled that given his incarceration, the petitioner was not in a position to diligently follow up on the appeal process, which would have otherwise been his right under service laws. The Bench further noted that while a departmental appeal could have been filed through the jail superintendent, the petitioner never received the dismissal order while in jail, meaning the delay was not attributable to him.

The ruling stressed that civil servants must be treated fairly, and it is the duty of the Service Tribunal to consider all facts judiciously when it comes to terms and conditions of service. The Bench ruled that the petitioner, being a victim of circumstances, could not be held responsible for the delay in filing the appeal.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…