Categories Op-Ed

Nepotism and Favouritism in Public Sector

By

Nepotism and favoritism have significant issues within Pakistan’s public sector, impacting everything from recruitment and promotions to the distribution of resources and the execution of policies. These practices undermine the principles of meritocracy. In Pakistan, the intertwining of political and bureaucratic spheres has often exacerbated these problems.

Political leaders frequently leverage their positions to secure advantageous roles for family members, friends, or loyalists. This form of nepotism not only affects the hiring processes but also influences promotions and departmental assignments. Such favoritism undermines the efficiency of public services, as positions may be filled based on personal connections rather than competence and qualifications.

For instance, in various government departments, key positions have been occupied by individuals who are well-connected rather than well-qualified. This often results in poor decision-making and administrative inefficiencies, as the appointed individuals may lack the necessary expertise or commitment to their roles.

Nepotism and favoritism can perpetuate a cycle of corruption and inefficiency that affects the entire public sector as key roles are given to individuals based on connections rather than merit. Efforts to address these issues have been inconsistent.

While there are regulations and procedures in place intended to ensure fairness and transparency, their implementation is often weak. Anti-corruption bodies and oversight mechanisms may lack the authority or the will to enforce reforms effectively.

Ultimately, addressing nepotism and favoritism is essential not only for improving the functioning of the public sector but also for rebuilding trust between the government and its citizens. Only through sustained efforts and systemic change can Pakistan hope to overcome these entrenched challenges and move towards a more just and effective public administration.

Breaking the grip of nepotism and favoritism in Pakistan’s public sector is not merely a bureaucratic necessity it is a moral imperative tied to the nation’s democratic promise. These practices have not only compromised the effectiveness of governance but have also dimmed the hopes of a generation striving for fairness and opportunity.
True reform begins when merit is not the exception but the rule, and when public office is seen not as a privilege to be inherited, but a responsibility to be earned. Until then, Pakistan’s progress longer will remain hostage to connections rather than competence and the future will be written not by the most capable, but by the best connected

—-

Courtesy – Dunya News

Author

Avatar photo

Making law simple, clear, and useful for everyone.

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Courtroom interior, Lahore High Court Multan Bench, empty judge's bench, wooden paneling, stained glass windows, light streaming in, legal books, solemn atmosphere, justice, judiciary, institutional fragility.

The Silent Erosion of Judicial Excellence – Is the Wrong Example Being Set!

The news of the proposed transfer of several Lahore High Court judges has left many…

The Court That Replaced the Constitution

Constitutions in Pakistan rarely die in flames. They survive the heat, only to be quietly…

women in law, female lawyers Pakistan, gender bias in legal profession, lack of sisterhood, professional rivalry among women, internalized patriarchy, court culture Multan, challenges for women lawyers, appearance policing in courts, gender discrimination in law, women not supporting women, mentorship gap in legal field, patriarchy in legal system, female solidarity issues, women empowerment in law

The Sisterhood That Never Was: When Women Don’t Support Women in Law

In the male-dominated corridors of law, I expected resistance, but not from the women. When…