Categories Courts

ATC Jails Senior PTI Leaders for 10 Years; Party Mulls Appeal, House Boycott

Anti-Terrorism Court Faisalabad on Thursday awarded sentence to a group of senior leaders from former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party to 10 years in prison over their alleged involvement in violent protests on May 9, 2023, according to PTI officials.

However, BBC Urdu cited incumbent Chairman of the PTI Barrister Gohar who informed the media to invoke jurisdiction of High Court through availing appeal opportunity against decision of the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) saying: ‘We will decide after consultation with Imran Khan whether to stay in the House or boycott’’.

Arab News reported Thursday the protests erupted after Khan was briefly arrested by paramilitary forces in Islamabad on corruption charges, sparking widespread demonstrations by his supporters waving PTI flags. Several demonstrators turned violent, attacking government buildings and military installations, prompting a sweeping crackdown by the state.

Thousands of PTI members and supporters were detained, and dozens were charged under anti-terrorism laws, with some cases referred to military courts.

“An Anti-Terrorism Court in Faisalabad city of Punjab has announced the decision of sentencing 108 people from PTI, including the opposition leader in the National Assembly, Omer Ayub Khan, the opposition leader in Senate, Shibli Faraz, along with parliamentary leader in the National Assembly, Zartaj Gul Wazir, and many others,” Zulfi Bukhari, a close aide to Khan and former federal minister, said in a statement. He has been cited saying, “Their status in both houses stands disqualified”, terming the sentencing “a sad day for democracy” in Pakistan.

The verdict follows another court ruling last week in Lahore where several other senior PTI members were handed sentences on similar charges related to May 9 rioting. Those convicted in Lahore included Yasmin Rashid, a former provincial health minister; Senator Ejaz Chaudhry; Mehmoodur Rashid, a former housing minister; and Umar Sarfraz Cheema, a former provincial governor and aide to Khan.

However, the court acquitted PTI Vice Chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi, who remains in custody in connection with other cases.

According to Geo News TV, his son, Zain Qureshi, was also acquitted by the Faisalabad court on Thursday, along with Chaudhry Fawad Hussain, a former federal minister under Khan’s administration.

The sentencing comes as PTI is planning to launch a protest campaign on August 5, coinciding with the second anniversary of Khan’s incarceration. The former prime minister, who was ousted in a no-confidence vote in 2022, remains in prison facing multiple charges he claims are politically motivated.

Speaking to reporters, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Khan condemned the verdicts, saying those sentenced were not supporters of political violence.

“They sacrificed their entire families yet remained committed to the system and within the bounds of Parliament,” he said. “These verdicts are causing immense damage to the country and the nation.”

Gohar added the party would “decide whether to return to Parliament, whether to boycott it, whether to permanently disengage from this system or whether to launch a movement.”

‘VICTORY FOR LAW, JUSTICE SYSTEM’

In a televised message, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar hailed the court’s verdict, accusing Khan supporters of damaging military installations, government property, injuring law enforcement personnel and committing acts of arson in various places across the country on May 9, 2023.

“The trial that took place for this was a very fair trial,” Tarar said. “This trial lasted for a long time, cross-examinations were held, witnesses were presented, and the evidence was also presented,” he said.

He described May 9, 2023, as a “dark” day in Pakistan’s history. “So, I think this [verdict] is a victory of the law, it is a victory of the justice system in this country,” the minister said. “And those people who thought they were above the law, that they would carry out these attacks and no action would be taken, I think their beliefs have also been proven wrong.”

Authorities say the May 9 riots caused billions in damages and led to over 3,000 arrests in Punjab province alone. Khan denies any wrongdoing.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…