Categories Courts

CJP-designate Directs Registrar’s Office to Categorize Cases Challenging Laws Separately

After taking the helm at the top court on Thursday recently appointed Chief of Pakistan Justice Yahya Afridi issued policy guidelines to the top court Registrar pertaining to transfer of cases requiring constitutional interpretation to the Constitutional Bench.
Justice Afridi’s remarks come after the Supreme Court referred a case regarding the right of pre-emption (Haq-e-Shufa’a) to a constitutional bench. A three-member bench, headed by CJP-designate Yahya Afridi, heard the case on Thursday.

Salman Aslam Butt

Former Attorney General for Pakistan Salman Aslam Butt who is counsel in the matter appeared on behalf of his client and presented arguments regarding the right of pre-emption.  During the hearing, Justice Shahid Waheed emphasized that the interpretation of constitutional provisions would be necessary for this case, so it should be transferred to the constitutional bench for further interpretation.In response, Chief Justice-designate Justice Yahya Afridi endorsed the colleague judge’s opinion and stated that the Registrar’s Office had been given a policy regarding constitutional benches. He also directed the Registrar’s Office that cases involving challenges to laws should be categorised separately.

Justice Yahya Afridi further added that cases requiring constitutional interpretation would be transferred to the appropriate bench as and when required. It is noteworthy that various benches of the Supreme Court transferred four cases to constitutional benches just a day prior. According to the law, the right of pre-emption, or Haq-e-Shufa’a, means the right possesses by one person to acquire a property sold to another in preference.

 

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner – Mohla & Mohla – Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Pakistan. A Satirist and Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at mohla@lawtoday.com.pk.

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

SC Upholds Charitable Status for Ethical Trade But Mandates Strict Proof of Application for Tax Exemption

ISLAMABAD – A recent Supreme Court ruling has provided essential clarity on the income tax…

SC Affirms Post Arrest Bail Standard: ‘Further Inquiry’ is Prerequisite for Liberty; Gravity of Offence Insufficient for Rejection

ISLAMABAD – While reinforcing fundamental principles of criminal jurisprudence, the Supreme Court has accepted post-arrest…

Lahore High Court, Justice Abher Gul Khan, Sajjad Ali acquittal, murder conviction overturned, reasonable doubt, flawed investigation, evidentiary failures, delayed FIR, post-mortem delay, withholding witnesses, unsubstantiated motive, unreliable testimony, forensic gaps, Khudayar Mohla

LHC Acquits Murder Convict as Prosecution Failed to Prove the Story

LAHORE – A single-member bench of the Lahore High Court comprising Justice Abher Gul Khan,…