Categories Courts

Councilors Move PHC Over Discrimination in Fund Allocation

While invoking jurisdiction of Peshawar High Court on Thursday as many as 22 representatives of  local government in various Tehsil councils challenged Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government’s decision to release development funds to 56 of the total 131 Tehsil councils in the province.

They urged the court to issue directives for provincial government to disburse funds impartially for development work in all Tehsils of the province without discrimination under the Provincial Finance Commission allocation.

Filing identical pleas in the matter, Mardan city mayor Himayatullah Mayar, Dir Tehsil council chairman Rafiullah and 20 other Tehsil council mayors and chairmen requested the court to declare illegal the finance department’s Dec 5 order for the release of development funds to 56 councils under the Provincial Finance Commission allocation.

The petitioners requested the court to direct the government to ensure that as per the PFC, an impartial release of funds should be held throughout the province including to the petitioners and other remaining tehsil councils.

They also sought interim relief, saying during pendency of the petition, the respondents including the KP government should be restrained from distribution of funds issued through the impugned order. The government ordered release of funds mostly to Tehsil councils, which have the ruling PTI’s members as mayors and chairmen.

Editor, Peshawar High Court, KP government, Tehsil councils, local government, development funds, Provincial Finance Commission, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Mardan mayor Himayatullah Mayar, Dir Tehsil council chairman Rafiullah, PTI, fiscal transfers, local government finances, KP Local Government Act, 2013, PFC allocation, discrimination in fund distribution, constitutional petition, local government law amendments, public accounts, fiscal year allocation, constitutional violations, Article 140-A, KP Local Government Rules, 2022, interim relief, judicial intervention, local body heads powers, ASC Babar Khan Yousafzi
ASC Babar Khan Yousafzi

Making provincial government through its chief secretary, local government and finance secretaries as respondents  the petitioners submitted saying they were elected as Tehsil council mayors and chairmen in result of local government polls on Dec 19, 2021, and March 31, 2022.

They further submitted that Article 140-A of the Constitution provided that each province should establish a local government system and devolve political, administrative and financial responsibility and authority to the elected representatives of the local government.

The petitioners said that Chapter-VIII of the KP Local Government Act, 2013, related to local government finances and particularly, section 30 provided for establishment of local funds in public accounts, whereas section 31 described the operation of funds and public accounts.

They said that the Act further provided for PFC and fiscal transfers and it was an enactment similar to transfer of funds by the federal government to the provinces under the National Finance Commission. The petitioners claimed that since the elections were held in 2021 and 2022 no funds in respect of PFC and fiscal transfers even had been released for development to tehsil local government.

They added that there were 131 tehsils which had remained deprived of PFC allocation since their elections, but on Dec 5, the impugned order was issued for releasing funds to 56 of the tehsils, whereas remaining 75 had been discriminated against and was not included in the order. The petitioners contended that as per the PFC, the provincial government was obligated to allocate 20 percent of its share to the local government in any fiscal year.

They, however, complained that the government had been withholding those funds for the last three years, while recently, it, through the impugned order, selected 56 of the councils for funding.

The petitioners contended that the KP City and Tehsil Local Government Rules, 2022, empowered mayors and chairmen to manage affairs of their councils, which also included overseeing development within their respective tehsils.

They added that allocation of funds exclusively to selected tehsils of the provincial government’s choice formed discrimination and violated Articles 4, 9 and 25 of the Constitution.

Bench Seek Comments From Respondents :

The Peshawar High Court on Thursday again sought comments from the provincial government about a set of petitions against amendments to the local government law, especially the provisions related to their powers.

A bench comprising Justice Ijaz Anwar and Justice Syed Arshad Ali issued the order while hearing five almost identical petitions filed by heads of several tehsil councils, including Himayatullah Mayar, Peshawar mayor Haji Zubair, Pabbi tehsil council chairman Ghayur Khattak, and other local body heads.

The petitioners requested the court to declare unconstitutional the KP Local Government (Amendment) Act, which was enacted by the provincial government in 2022. The bench wondered if the local government’s representatives didn’t have powers, what tasks they would perform.

Babar Khan Yousafzai, Qazi Jawad Ehsanullah and other lawyers for the petitioners, said the KP Local Government Act, 2013, clearly spelled out the powers and functions of mayors of city councils and chairmen of tehsil council as well as village and neighbourhood councils in the province, but the impugned amendments to the law removed those provisions and declared that the local body heads would exercise and perform such powers and functions as prescribed by the rules.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Imran Khan defamation case, Rs10 billion defamation suit, Shehbaz Sharif defamation case, Supreme Court Pakistan, SC bench defamation, Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, PTI founder defamation, Lahore High Court order, Punjab government impleaded, Defamation Ordinance 2002, review petition Supreme Court, right of defence closed, Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Panama Papers bribe allegation, defamation cases six months, SC defamation appeals, trial court Lahore, Justice Ayesha Malik bench, defamation proceedings stayed, PTI legal battle

Defamation Cases Must Be Decided Within Six Months, Says SC Judge

ISLAMABAD: While hearing set of appeals relating to defamation matter on Tuesday top court Justice…

Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, judicial reforms Pakistan, Supreme Court reform session, Reform Action Plan RAP, death penalty cases reduction, case pendency Supreme Court, court digitization Pakistan, e-courts Pakistan, Federal Ombudsman Naveed Kamran Baloch, Law and Justice Commission Pakistan, Federal Judicial Academy, alternative dispute resolution Pakistan, case management Supreme Court, KPIs judiciary Pakistan, e-payment court fees, Public Facilitation Centre Supreme Court, barcoding file tracking, death sentence appeals Pakistan, SC case disposal rate, transparency justice system Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

All Remaining Death Sentence Appeals to Be Fixed for Hearing Within 30 Days: SC

ISLAMABAD : Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Yahya Afridi on Tuesday chaired the tenth interactive…

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…