Categories Courts

ICJ Sets to Hear Arguments on States’ Climate Change Obligation

A day ago International Court of Justice announced to conduct public hearings on December 2, 2024 relating to its advisory opinion on states’ obligations regarding climate change.

The UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted by consensus a 2023 resolution seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on states’ climate change obligations. The UNGA sought answers to two questions: (1) under international law, what are the climate change obligations that states have, and (2) what are the legal consequences if a state causes environmental damage, harming both vulnerable small island developing states and present and future generations?

The UNGA asked the ICJ to consider environmental obligations under various international legal instruments such as the UN Charter, the Paris Agreement, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. By including human rights instruments in its question, the UNGA signaled recognition that climate change obligations are a possible human rights issue.

This is the third climate change-related advisory opinion brought to international courts in the past year and builds on fresh international developments. Earlier this year, in May, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea provided an opinion that defined greenhouse gas emissions as a form of marine pollution and advised that states must “take all necessary measures to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution from greenhouse gas emissions.” Also in May, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights began hearings on whether Latin American states have human rights obligations to manage climate change, with a decision expected by the end of 2024.

This oral hearing announcement follows the year-long written submission process, during which the ICJ received the most submissions it has ever received for an advisory opinion, 91 written submissions, and 62 rebuttals. The volume and interest in this advisory opinion highlight its potential landmark impact on international climate change obligations. The ICJ decides whether and when to release the 91 written submissions. If it chooses to do so, the submissions will be made available after December 2, 2024, when oral proceedings begin.

ICJ advisory opinions are legally non-binding on UN member states; however, they are authoritative legal documents. How this advisory opinion came about supports member states abiding by the opinion because the resolution was adopted by consensus, meaning all member states agreed on it. This adds significant weight to the opinion and will act as a powerful moral suasion once released.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, and Civil and Criminal Law. Contact: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Punjab Judicial Academy, Justice Aalia Neelum, Lahore High Court, PJA Board Meeting, first female Chairperson PJA, judicial training Punjab, judicial reforms Pakistan, Punjab Judicial Academy Act 2007, Section 4 PJA Act, judicial officers training, court personnel training, court management training, case management Punjab, delay reduction techniques, alternate dispute resolution training, judgment writing training, judicial administration Punjab, legal education Pakistan, Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Justice Jawad Hassan, Amjad Iqbal Ranjha, Lahore news, judicial capacity building, Federal Judicial Academy collaboration, legal research Punjab, judicial ethics training, law and development Punjab, legislative drafting training, PJA conferences seminars workshops.

Chief Justice LHC Justice Miss Aalia Neelum Chairs PJA Board Meeting, Marks Historic First for Academy

LAHORE – Days ago the Punjab Judicial Academy marked a significant milestone when Chief Justice…

Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), 27th Constitutional Amendment, FCC commences operations, judicial arena, Islamabad High Court (IHC), FCC judges oath-taking, Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Justice Arshad Hussain Shah, Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan, courtrooms arranged, logistical issues, teething problems, IHC Courtroom No. 2, Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, FCC high-profile cases, amenity plots case, Sindh High Court (SHC) judgment stayed, Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC), public-interest case, IHC relocation, Red Zone difficulties, Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, superior judiciary Pakistan, structural change judicial framework.

Federal Constitutional Court Opens in IHC Building, Ushering in New Post-27th Amendment Judicial Order

ISLAMABAD – The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) finally commenced operations on Monday, marking the first…

Lahore High Court, 27th Constitutional Amendment, challenged, judicial independence, Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Munir Ahmed, Mian Shabbir Ismail, basic structure violation, Supreme Court original jurisdiction, Federal Constitutional Court, abolition of Supreme Court powers, 1973 Constitution, judicial history distortion, compromise of judiciary, legislative transparency, lack of public debate, void amendment, stay on implementation.

Constitutionality of 27th Amendment Challenged in LHC

LAHORE – Invoking jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court – petitioners challenged legality of the…