Categories Courts

ICJ Sets to Hear Arguments on States’ Climate Change Obligation

A day ago International Court of Justice announced to conduct public hearings on December 2, 2024 relating to its advisory opinion on states’ obligations regarding climate change.

The UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted by consensus a 2023 resolution seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on states’ climate change obligations. The UNGA sought answers to two questions: (1) under international law, what are the climate change obligations that states have, and (2) what are the legal consequences if a state causes environmental damage, harming both vulnerable small island developing states and present and future generations?

The UNGA asked the ICJ to consider environmental obligations under various international legal instruments such as the UN Charter, the Paris Agreement, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. By including human rights instruments in its question, the UNGA signaled recognition that climate change obligations are a possible human rights issue.

This is the third climate change-related advisory opinion brought to international courts in the past year and builds on fresh international developments. Earlier this year, in May, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea provided an opinion that defined greenhouse gas emissions as a form of marine pollution and advised that states must “take all necessary measures to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution from greenhouse gas emissions.” Also in May, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights began hearings on whether Latin American states have human rights obligations to manage climate change, with a decision expected by the end of 2024.

This oral hearing announcement follows the year-long written submission process, during which the ICJ received the most submissions it has ever received for an advisory opinion, 91 written submissions, and 62 rebuttals. The volume and interest in this advisory opinion highlight its potential landmark impact on international climate change obligations. The ICJ decides whether and when to release the 91 written submissions. If it chooses to do so, the submissions will be made available after December 2, 2024, when oral proceedings begin.

ICJ advisory opinions are legally non-binding on UN member states; however, they are authoritative legal documents. How this advisory opinion came about supports member states abiding by the opinion because the resolution was adopted by consensus, meaning all member states agreed on it. This adds significant weight to the opinion and will act as a powerful moral suasion once released.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Rawalpindi Anti-Narcotics Court, second Anti-Narcotics Court Rawalpindi, Anti-Narcotics Force court Rawalpindi, drug cases backlog Rawalpindi, 500 pending narcotics cases, special anti-narcotics courts Punjab, Rawalpindi division judiciary, speedy disposal narcotics cases, Punjab government anti-drug measures, Counter Narcotics Force Punjab, drug smuggling crackdown Pakistan, narcotics cases Pakistan, Additional District and Sessions Judge Rawalpindi, District and Sessions Judge Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi, Anti-Narcotics Force, Punjab Government, drug control courts Pakistan, special courts Pakistan, narcotics trial courts, criminal justice system Punjab, rising drug cases Rawalpindi, law and order Punjab, judiciary expansion Rawalpindi, anti-drug campaign Pakistan, court reforms Punjab, narcotics prosecution Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla.

Punjab Govt Approves Second Anti-Narcotics Court in Rawalpindi Division

RAWALPINDI: Approval has been granted for the establishment of a second Anti-Narcotics Court in Rawalpindi. The…

Climate Justice: UN Urged to Codify ICJ Obligations in New Global Resolution

Governments must not squander the opportunity to turn the International Court of Justice’s 2025 Advisory…

LHC Sets Aside PRA Decision Levying Multi-Million-Rupee Sales Tax on FWE-II

RAWALPINDI: While authoring the 16-page verdict in a matter relating to a multi-million-rupee sales tax…