Categories Courts

ICJ Sets to Hear Arguments on States’ Climate Change Obligation

A day ago International Court of Justice announced to conduct public hearings on December 2, 2024 relating to its advisory opinion on states’ obligations regarding climate change.

The UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted by consensus a 2023 resolution seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on states’ climate change obligations. The UNGA sought answers to two questions: (1) under international law, what are the climate change obligations that states have, and (2) what are the legal consequences if a state causes environmental damage, harming both vulnerable small island developing states and present and future generations?

The UNGA asked the ICJ to consider environmental obligations under various international legal instruments such as the UN Charter, the Paris Agreement, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. By including human rights instruments in its question, the UNGA signaled recognition that climate change obligations are a possible human rights issue.

This is the third climate change-related advisory opinion brought to international courts in the past year and builds on fresh international developments. Earlier this year, in May, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea provided an opinion that defined greenhouse gas emissions as a form of marine pollution and advised that states must “take all necessary measures to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution from greenhouse gas emissions.” Also in May, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights began hearings on whether Latin American states have human rights obligations to manage climate change, with a decision expected by the end of 2024.

This oral hearing announcement follows the year-long written submission process, during which the ICJ received the most submissions it has ever received for an advisory opinion, 91 written submissions, and 62 rebuttals. The volume and interest in this advisory opinion highlight its potential landmark impact on international climate change obligations. The ICJ decides whether and when to release the 91 written submissions. If it chooses to do so, the submissions will be made available after December 2, 2024, when oral proceedings begin.

ICJ advisory opinions are legally non-binding on UN member states; however, they are authoritative legal documents. How this advisory opinion came about supports member states abiding by the opinion because the resolution was adopted by consensus, meaning all member states agreed on it. This adds significant weight to the opinion and will act as a powerful moral suasion once released.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, FAO, First Appeal, Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, LHC Bahawalpur, Ad Interim Injunction, Temporary Injunction, Stay Application, Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Maintainability, Specific Performance, Balance of Convenience, Balance of Inconvenience, Interlocutory Order, Solar Energy Dispute, On-Grid Solar System, Solar Installation Agreement, Commercial Litigation, Energy Contract Dispute, SS Paper Board Mills, Swift Solar Energy, Civil Judge Rahim Yar Khan, Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan, Sardar Abdul Basit Khan Advocate, Rs 87868000, Daily Loss Rs 250000, Installment Default, Security Cheques, Payment Dispute, Commercial Loss, Shariq Builders 2024 MLD 32, Muhammad Rasab 1998 MLD 2045, Abdullah Sugar Mills 2003 SCMR 1026, Indus Motor Company 2025 CLC 1951, Mst Shazia Mehmood 2025 MLD 1976, Approved for Reporting, FAO No 09 2026 BWP, March 12 2026, Snake Bitten Antidote, Judicial Empathy, 15 Days Directive, Pakistan Court News, Lahore High Court Order 2026, Solar Energy Pakistan, Civil Court Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan Solar Dispute, LHC Order 2026, Pakistan Judiciary News, Court Reporting Pakistan, Legal News Pakistan, High Court Pakistan 2026

“Snake-Bitten May Die Waiting for Antidote” – LHC Disposes Solar Appeal, Orders Trial Court to Decide Stay Application in 15 Days

BAHAWALPUR : A Rahim Yar Khan-based paper and board mill, bleeding Rs. 250,000 daily, invoked…

Khudayar Mohla,Peshawar High Court, PHC ruling, civil courts jurisdiction, load shedding disputes, PESCO load shedding, Kohat load shedding, NEPRA jurisdiction, electricity load shedding Pakistan, PHC verdict, Justice Waqar Ahmad, NEPRA Act 1997, Section 45 NEPRA Act, civil revision petition, Jangal Khel Kohat, prolonged load shedding, 18 hour load shedding, discriminatory load shedding, fundamental rights violation, electricity consumers Pakistan, PESCO administrative policies, Barrister Asadul Mulk, power outages Pakistan, electricity distribution Pakistan, NEPRA regulatory body, special jurisdiction principle, Section 9 CPC, Code of Civil Procedure, Supreme Court precedents Pakistan, electricity complaints Pakistan, power sector regulation, load shedding KPK, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa electricity, consumer rights Pakistan, electricity grievances, NEPRA complaint forum, civil court dismissed, district court Kohat, electricity generation transmission, power distribution policy, judicial intervention electricity, legal jurisdiction electricity, Pakistan power sector, electricity law Pakistan, regulatory authority Pakistan, load shedding schedule, electricity supply company, high court KPK, Pakistan judiciary, electricity policy Pakistan, power outages fundamental rights

PHC Rules Civil Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Load Shedding Disputes

PESHAWAR: While hearing a civil revision petition in a matter relating to prolonged daily load…

AAC Gilgit-Baltistan, GB Awami Action Committee, Advocate Ehsan Ali arrested, AAC leaders arrested, anti-state speeches Gilgit, Iftar party arrest Pakistan, Anti-Terrorism Act Pakistan, ATC remand Gilgit, Rehmat Shah ATC judge, PESCO load shedding, GB Bar Council statement, GB High Court Bar Association, HRCP condemnation, human rights Gilgit-Baltistan, Advocate Nafees arrested, Meher Ali arrested, Engineer Mehboob Wali, FIR anti-terrorism Gilgit, Jutial police station FIR, AAC protest Gilgit, political arrests Pakistan, civil liberties Gilgit-Baltistan, freedom of speech Pakistan, peaceful protest rights Pakistan, anti-terrorism law misuse, GB Supreme Appellate Court Bar Association, legal community Gilgit, rule of law Gilgit-Baltistan, political suppression Pakistan, AAC chairman arrested, Asghar Shah FIR, Masoodur Rehman FIR, Engineer Nadeem FIR, Skardu public outreach, due process Pakistan, fundamental rights Pakistan, political activity restrictions, civil society Gilgit-Baltistan, lawyers arrested Pakistan, advocate illegal detention, bar council demands release, HRCP Pakistan statement, Gilgit police raids, AAC leaders remand, anti-state protest FIR, constitutional rights Pakistan, political dissent Pakistan, GB politics, Gilgit-Baltistan news, Pakistan human rights, legal fraternity Pakistan, ATC physical remand, Khudayar Mohla

Four AAC Leaders Remanded In Gilgit Over Alleged Anti-State Speeches; Bar Council And HRCP Condemn Arrests

GILGIT: In a development that has sent shockwaves through the legal fraternity and civil society…