Categories Courts

LCRF Urges NHA to Revoke Toll Tax Hike Notification

Expressing grave concern over recent toll tax increase on national highways and motorways on Monday Lawyers for Consumer Rights Forum (LCRF) urged National Highways Authority (NHA) to withdraw notification immediately to facilitate the commuters.  

President LCRF Khudayar Mohla is of the view that the government is not meant for business. Terming recent increase in motorway and highways toll taxes unjustifiable and unlawful he said it will increase unfair burden on commuters. He further said that LCRF has principally decided to challenge the legality of increase in toll tax.

LCRF President Khudayar Mohla pointed out a large number of commuters will travel around the country on the occasion of Eidul Fitr and will pay unjustifiable extra toll taxes which is a sheer violation of fundamental rights.

It is pertinent to mention that the NHA has announced another toll tax increase on national highways and motorways saying the increase will take effect from April 01. An official notification has been released in this regard. The toll charges for cars will be Rs70, vans Rs150, and bes Rs250.

Two- and three-axle trucks would give Rs300, while larger trucks will pay Rs550. Major changes have been implemented on several key motorways, including M1, M3, M4, M5, M14, and E35. The toll for cars on the M1 Islamabad-Peshawar Motorway has increased from Rs500 to Rs550.

On the M3 Lahore-Abdul Hakeem Motorway, the fee has increased from Rs700 to Rs800. Likewise, car tolls on the M4 Pindi Bhattian-Faisalabad-Multan route have gone up from Rs950 to Rs1,050, while those on the M5 Multan-Sukkur Motorway have increased from Rs1,100 to Rs1,200.

The M14 Dera Ismail Khan-Hakla Motorway now charges Rs650 for cars, up from Rs600. The toll for cars on the E35 Hasan Abdal-Havelian-Mansehra route has been increased from Rs250 to Rs300. For big machineries, toll rates across these motorways now range from Rs850 to Rs5,750.

Author

Avatar photo

Making law simple, clear, and useful for everyone.

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…