Categories Courts

No Inquiry Needed: SC Upholds Firing of Civil Servant Over Absenteeism

ISLAMABAD – While addressing two key legal questions in service matter whether a regular inquiry was necessary and if treating the absence as Extra Ordinary Leave (EOL) was a form of punishment, top court upheld termination of civil servant saying there is no need to conduct regular inquiry for an admitted absence from duty.

The Supreme Court has upheld the termination of a civil servant, ruling that a regular inquiry is not required for an admitted absence from duty. The court’s decision was made in the case of National Bank of Pakistan v. Zahoor Ahmed Mengal, as detailed in the judgment dated December 30, 2019, from the High Court of Balochistan, Quetta.

The matter involved a civil servant case whose service was terminated without a formal inquiry after he was found to be absent from his post. The period of absence was treated as EOL without pay.

The Law Today Pakistan has learnt that in its verdict,  the court cited previous judgments, including Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Division, Islamabad vs. Mamoon Ahmed Malik (2020 SCMR 1154), to assert that a regular inquiry is not needed when the fact of absence is admitted, as there are no disputed facts to be investigated.

The court also referenced the cases of NAB through its Chairman vs. Muhammad Shafique (2020 SCMR 425) and Kafyat Ullah Khan vs. Inspector General of Police, Islamabad and another (Civil Appeal No.1661 of 2019).

Based on these precedents, it concluded that treating an unauthorized absence as EOL is not a punishment. Instead, it is a justified administrative action that an employer is entitled to take.

The ruling sets a clear precedent: in cases of admitted absence from duty, a regular inquiry is not mandatory, and the conversion of the absence period to EOL without pay is a legitimate action, not a punitive measure.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…