Categories Courts

PTI invokes SC jurisdiction against Election Act Amendment Bill

While challenging legality of recently approved Election Act Amendment Bill in the National Assembly on Wednesday Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) urged the top court to grant a stay order against electoral watchdog action to allocate reserved seats to other political parties in the House.

Invoking Supreme Court (SC) jurisidiciton under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan through Advocate Salman Akram Raja PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan made the federal government and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) as respondents.

The National Assembly has approved the bill by a majority vote a day ago despite strong protests and objections from opposition parties. Petitioner urged the top court to declare recently approved Election Act Amendment Bill in the National Assembly null and void terming it  “unconstitutional and illegal”.
PTI has also moved the apex court to immediately halt the electoral watchdog from allocating reserved seats to other political parties.
“The PTI has already submitted lists for the reserved seats to the Election Commission,” the petition stated. The party demands that women and non-Muslim reserved seats be allotted to PTI, asserting their entitlement to these seats following the Supreme Court’s July 12 decision.
The top court’s July 12 decision, delivered by a 13-judge full bench, handed a major blow to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s ruling coalition by declaring that the opposition party PTI is entitled to reserved seats for women and non-Muslims.
A day ago , in a statement delivered on the floor of the National Assembly (NA), Gohar criticised the bill, asserting that it undermines democratic principles. “This parliament is indeed supreme, but the authority to interpret lies with the Supreme Court,” Gohar maintained.
He emphasised the PTI’s commitment to challenging what he described as a “politically motivated” piece of legislation.
On July 19, ECP announced its decision to implement the SC’s ruling which facilitated the PTI-backed MNAs to take part in the assembly’s proceedings under the umbrella of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) rather than the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC).
In a press release, the electoral watchdog confirmed its commitment to comply with the court’s directive but instructed its legal team to identify any implementation obstacles promptly.

 

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Tayyaba Munir, Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court of Pakistan, Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood, Section 306 PPC, Death Sentence Commuted, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim, Criminal Law Pakistan, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Life Imprisonment, Vehari Murder Case, Qisas and Diyat Law

SC Coins ‘Judiciary-Sponsored Orphanhood’ Doctrine to Commute Father’s Death Sentence

Supreme Court · Criminal Law · Pakistan ISLAMABAD: While deciding a jail appeal, Supreme Court…

difference between dismissed for non-prosecution and consigned to record, Lahore High Court civil procedure ruling, restoration of suit under CPC Pakistan, administrative consignment of case file, LHC ruling on waqf graveyard land dispute, Khudayar Mohla, Lahore High Court, LHC judgment, Civil Procedure Code Pakistan, Order IX CPC, dismissed for non-prosecution, consigned to record meaning, restoration of civil suit, Justice Anwaar Hussain, waqf graveyard dispute, Pakistan civil litigation

LHC Rules ‘Dismissal for Non-Prosecution’ and ‘Consigning to Record’ Have Distinct Legal Consequences

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that the expressions ‘dismissed for non-prosecution’ and ‘consigned…

petroleum price hike Pakistan, fuel price litigation Pakistan, Lahore High Court petition, petrol price increase case, petroleum levy controversy Pakistan, constitutional challenge fuel prices

JAF Moves LHC, Questions Legality of Fuel Price Hike

LAHORE: In the wake of recent hike in petroleum prices, Judicial Activism Forum has invoked…