Categories Courts

SC rules PTI eligible for reserved seats in NA & PAs

While pronouncing verdict in a matter relating to reserved seats of women and minorities to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf on Friday the top court overturned Peshawar High Court (PHC) decision saying the Pakistan Tehreek-e- Insaf (PTI) shall be entitled to reserved seats in National and Provincial assemblies.

The Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC), comprising PTI-backed lawmakers, has challenged the PHC’s March 14 order that deprived the party of reserved seats. The PHC through its verdict dashed the PTI’s hopes of getting reserved seats as it dismissed the SIC’s petition challenging the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) ruling that denied reserved seats to the party.

Soon after the Supreme Court (SC) announced verdict in the matter, Rana Sanaullah – advisor to Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif while addressing a press conference criticized the top court decision terming the verdict as like rewriting the Constitution. BBC Urdu cited Rana saying the decisions which are beyond understanding are never in the interest of the country. According to him, the members who would be de-seated as a result of the top court decision can invoke the SC jurisdiction through review petitions.

According to BBC Urdu, Federal law minister Azim Nazir Tarar expressed during a press conference saying the SIC had claimed whereas relief was given to the PTI in the matter which he said was not party in the case. Claiming the SC ‘s decision on reserved seats as a matter of choice, Tarar informed that after consulting the political parties, they will decide the next legal plan of action.

Announcing a five-page short order in the matter on Friday the top court in its majority 8-5 decision termed the conduct of Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in reserved seats matter as ‘unconstitutional’, saying the PTI would remain intact as a political party even without being assigned an election symbol.

As many as eights judges of the full court who were hearing appeals against the PHC verdict in the matter including Justices Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Munib Akhtar, Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Ayesha A. Malik, Athar Minallah, Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Shahid Waheed and Irfan Saadat Khan have decided the appeals in favour of the PTI.

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah announced the 8-5 majority verdict, nullifying the PHC order wherein it had upheld the ECP decision denying the reserved seats to the SIC. The full bench, led by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa, comprises Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Mazhar, Justice Minallah, Justice Syed Rizvi, Justice Malik, Justice Waheed, Justice Saadat, and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan.

According to the verdict copy of which available with TLTP, all the eight Justices issued directives to the PTI to file list of its candidates for reserved seats in National and provincial assemblies before the ECP within 15 working days saying, “The PTI shall be entitled to reserved seats for women and minorities in the National Assembly accordingly. The PTI shall, within 15 working days of this Order file its lists of candidates for the said reserved seats and the provisions of the Elections Act, 2017 and the Elections Rules, 2017 (Rules) shall be applied to such lists in such manner as gives effect to this Order in full measure”.

The 8 Justices also said in the order, “In case the Commission or PTI need any clarification or order so as to give effect to this para in full measure, it shall forthwith apply to the Court by making an appropriate application, which shall be put up before the Judges constituting the majority in chambers for such orders and directions as may be deemed appropriate”.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…