Categories Courts

SC seeks progress report from ECP on expats voting right

Overseas Pakistanis may exercise voting right in upcoming general elections as top court sought progress report form Election Commission of Pakistan in response to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf and Awami Muslim League’ pleas seeking declaration for expats right to vote.

A three-member bench led by Justice Ijazul Ahsan resumed hearing of the pleas that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan and Pakistan Awami Muslim League (AML) founder Sheikh Rashid had filed invoking jurisdiction in the matter.

During adjudication of the case the top court questioned on what grounds an amendment of law of the right to vote of overseas Pakistanis not constitutionally valid?

A member of the bench Justice Muneeb Akhtar observed saying the “Parliament enacted the Election Act in 2017”, adding that “Section 94 of the act regarding the right to vote of overseas Pakistanis is clear.” He further remarked “in 2018, the Supreme Court had declared Section 94 as constitutional.”

“In the year 2021, the law was further improved, in 2022 Parliament was brought back to the old level,”, Justice Muneeb Akhtar added saying, “How can the top court now declare the law to be unconstitutional which was declared constitutional in the past”, ?”

Advocate Arif Chaudhry, counsel for AML chief, submitted that according to NADRA, if the ECP signs an agreement, they can create an I-voting system within a year. He further submitted that during the past, NADRA had sought a year’s time, but in response to the court directives, the system was built in six months.

“No objection was raised on the pilot project in 2017,” added Chaudhary. Sheikh Rashid’s counsel apprised the bench that the electoral watchdog has halted work on the issue of overseas Pakistanis’ right to vote.

“If the ECP takes steps to give the right to vote to overseas Pakistanis, there is no obstacle,” he added. Justice Akhtar then questioned if the amendment of the Election Act has affected basic human rights, adding that “if the Parliament is amending the law, why should the court interfere?”

He also noted that “every enactment of Parliament is a constitutional concept no matter what the courts’ observations are.”  “The petition filed for violation of fundamental rights should be clear,” remarked Justice Akhtar. Justice Mazahar Ali Naqvi then directed the petitioners’ counsel to submit an amended application and also directed the electoral watchdog to submit a progress report on voting rights of overseas Pakistanis.

It is pertinent to mention that during last year, the federal cabinet approved an election amendment bill aiming to reverse the PTI-era legislation which had granted voting rights to overseas Pakistanis and made it compulsory to hold elections through electronic voting machines (EVMs), deciding that pilot projects should determine the fate of both the proposals.

The cabinet termed the overseas Pakistanis as a valuable asset of the country saying it was important to include them in the election process. In this regard, it said that the previous government enacted legislation without taking the ECP into confidence.

Author

More From Author

1 comment

Just wanna remark that you have a very decent web site, I enjoy the design it really stands out.

Leave a Reply to gralion torile Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, CJP Yahya Afridi, women’s rights in Pakistan, judiciary commitment to women rights, gender responsive justice Pakistan, International Women’s Day Pakistan judiciary, Supreme Court of Pakistan women rights, access to justice for women Pakistan, gender sensitive judiciary Pakistan, National Judicial Policy Making Committee NJPMC, NJPMC gender responsive justice agenda, judicial reforms Pakistan 2026–27, women facilitation centers courts Pakistan, legal aid for women Pakistan, women legal advisory helpline Pakistan, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan reforms, family law reforms Pakistan, mediation and family support services courts Pakistan, gender fair language in justice system, legal awareness for women Pakistan, rural women legal rights Pakistan, women empowerment through justice system, Pakistan judiciary reforms for women, rule of law and women protection Pakistan, Islamabad Supreme Court, Khudayar Mohla, justice for women justice for Pakistan

Justice for Women is Justice for Pakistan, says CJP Afridi

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi has reaffirmed the judiciary’s commitment to protecting…

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…