Categories Courts

SC Terms Pension a Constitutional Right – Directs OGDCL to Immediately Pay Petitioner Arrears

ISLAMABAD – While exercising appellate jurisdiction, a two-member bench of the top court comprising Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Aqeel Ahmad Abbasi has directed the Oil and Gas Development Company Limited (OGDCL) to immediately disburse additional pension to a retired employee, warning that judicial intervention will follow in case of non-compliance.

A 10-page verdict, penned by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, emphatically anchors the right to pension within the framework of fundamental rights, dismissing any interpretation of it as an act of grace or charity.

The judgment holds the right to pension as an inherent ‘constitutional prerogative’, not a matter of managerial discretion.  “Pension is not a matter of bounty, charity, or benevolence – it is a right protected under Articles 9 and 14 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and inseparably linked with the right to life, dignity and livelihood, for without sustenance in old age, these rights ring hollow,” the court asserted.

The ruling conceptualizes the pensionary benefit as a ‘crystallised return on years of faithful service, a form of deferred wages earned through the sweat, labour, and loyalty of an employee.’ This position underscores the principle that the entitlement is compensatory and earned, rather than gratuitous.

The Apex Court observed that to deny or withhold this accrued right is to divest a citizen of rightfully earned security, a position that cannot be constitutionally sustained.

“It embodies the principle that those who serve must not be cast aside in their twilight years,” the bench noted. Furthermore, “To deny or withhold pension is to strip a person of the security they have justly earned, leaving them exposed to indignity, vulnerability, and want.”

The judgment explicitly cautioned corporate entities against arbitrary actions concerning employee entitlements: “To trifle with pension is, therefore, to trifle with constitutional justice itself.” It was stressed that the grant of pension must be “not only adequate but also predictable,” maintaining an “element of respect and empathy” consonant with the constitutional value of dignity.

Setting aside the impugned judgment of the Islamabad High Court in the matter, the Supreme Court declared that the petitioner was “entitled to Additional Pension under Section 5 of the Ordinance, 2001 read with Regulation 15(1A) of the Pension Regulations.”

The OGDCL has been directed to “pay the Additional Pension to the petitioner… within 30 days from the receipt of this Judgment and submit a compliance report to the Registrar of this Court.”

The ruling concludes with a clear judicial ultimatum: “In case the compliance report is not received till the first week of November 2025, the case will be put up on the judicial side for necessary orders.”

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…