Categories Courts

SCBA’s role in Punjab CM’s election case ‘biased’: CJP

Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial Monday termed the Supreme Court Bar Association’s (SCBA) role in the Punjab chief minister election case “biased”.

A private TV channel reported, addressing a full court reference on the eve of the beginning of the new judicial year, CJP Bandial recalled the Punjab CM election case, which drew criticism from political parties. The CJP said that the federation requested a full court bench which was not in accordance with the law, while the role of the SBCA was also “biased”.

In July, the SC had termed the ruling of the former Punjab Assembly deputy speaker, Dost Mazari, “illegal” and announced Pervez Elahi as the new CM of the province. The ruling coalition had demanded that a full bench hear the case and the government’s demands were also backed by the top court’s bar association. “Patience was shown despite the political parties’ strong reaction to the annulment of the ruling of the then Punjab deputy speaker Dost Muhammad Mazari,” the chief justice said. CJP Bandial added: “We are aware that the country is facing a serious economic crisis, but the law is equal for all.”

Referring to the Judicial Commission of Pakistan’s (JCP) meeting in which the body had rejected Bandial’s nominated judges of high courts for their appointment to the Supreme Court, the CJP asked, did the federal government’s response respect the judiciary?  CJP Bandial said that when he assumed the office, there were challenges related to the provision of inexpensive and speedy justice, a backlog of cases and usage of suo motu power.  Highlighting the achievements, the CJP said that the number of cases pending with the judiciary reduced to 50,265 from 54,134.

“The respected judges sacrificed their yearly vacations and decided 6,458 cases during a short period of June-September.”  Stressing the need for new appointments to the top judiciary, he urged the SCBA to assist the court.

Talking about speedy justice, the CJP said that he, after consultation with other judges, took notice of the then NA deputy speaker Qasim Suri’s ruling and declared it illegal after a five-day hearing and issued the verdict within three days. A large number of cases were lodged with the apex court following the political events in March 2022, he noted.

Author

More From Author

You May Also Like

Rawalpindi Anti-Narcotics Court, second Anti-Narcotics Court Rawalpindi, Anti-Narcotics Force court Rawalpindi, drug cases backlog Rawalpindi, 500 pending narcotics cases, special anti-narcotics courts Punjab, Rawalpindi division judiciary, speedy disposal narcotics cases, Punjab government anti-drug measures, Counter Narcotics Force Punjab, drug smuggling crackdown Pakistan, narcotics cases Pakistan, Additional District and Sessions Judge Rawalpindi, District and Sessions Judge Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi, Anti-Narcotics Force, Punjab Government, drug control courts Pakistan, special courts Pakistan, narcotics trial courts, criminal justice system Punjab, rising drug cases Rawalpindi, law and order Punjab, judiciary expansion Rawalpindi, anti-drug campaign Pakistan, court reforms Punjab, narcotics prosecution Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla.

Punjab Govt Approves Second Anti-Narcotics Court in Rawalpindi Division

RAWALPINDI: Approval has been granted for the establishment of a second Anti-Narcotics Court in Rawalpindi. The…

Climate Justice: UN Urged to Codify ICJ Obligations in New Global Resolution

Governments must not squander the opportunity to turn the International Court of Justice’s 2025 Advisory…

LHC Sets Aside PRA Decision Levying Multi-Million-Rupee Sales Tax on FWE-II

RAWALPINDI: While authoring the 16-page verdict in a matter relating to a multi-million-rupee sales tax…