Categories Courts

AJK HC Suspends USCP Employees Removal Order

While removing suspension order of more than 50 daily wagers of Utility Stores Corporation of Pakistan, the AJK High Court has decided to adjudicate the plea seeking Corporation employees’ service regularization.

The Utility Stores Corporation of Pakistan (USCP) is a state-owned enterprise – operates chain stores throughout the country that provide basic commodities to the general public at prices which are lower than the open market because the government subsidizes them whereas it has operation in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK).

Filing petition on behalf of his clients, Barrister Syed Abdul Basit Gillani has urged the court to determine legality of the USCP orders saying instead of regularization of these daily wagers employees services, the Corporation has issued removal from services orders.

Editor, Khudayar Mohla, AJK High Court, USCP daily wagers, Utility Stores Corporation Pakistan, employees regularization, USCP removal orders, Barrister Syed Abdul Basit Gillani, Justice Shahid Bahar, National Assembly Standing Committee, court ruling, subsidized commodities, AJK legal news, labor rights, government subsidies, employment law Pakistan, daily wage workers, judicial review
Barrister Syed Abdul Basit Gillani with USCP employees after hearing of the matter

Appearing before single-member bench of the Justice Shahid Bahar, advocates Syed Abdul Basit Gillani and Syed Mazher Azad Gillani argued saying the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Industries and Production in 2017, had issued directives to the USCP to regularize their services after scrutiny and verification at the Zonal Office. Barrister Gillani apprised the court none of the petitioners was regularized. Instead, they were removed from their services. After brief hearing of the arguments, Justice Shahid Bahar of the AJK High Court suspends relieving orders of the petitioners and directed the USCP to restrain from removing any of its daily wage employees. Declaring the employees’ removal orders null and void, the court ruled that “as per the stance of the petitioners, the said orders are liable to set-at-naught.” Later, the court adjourned the case till April 14,2025.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

FCC Super Tax verdict, Federal Constitutional Court Pakistan, Super Tax on high earners, Parliament taxing powers Pakistan, Section 4C Income Tax Ordinance, Super Tax legality Pakistan, Chief Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, income tax law Pakistan, high income earners tax, oil and gas sector Super Tax, tax exemptions Pakistan, mudarabah Super Tax exemption, mutual funds tax exemption, unit trust funds Pakistan, retrospective taxation Pakistan, double taxation challenge, Supreme Court Super Tax case, High Courts Super Tax ruling, constitutional amendments Pakistan, 26th Constitutional Amendment, 27th Constitutional Amendment, revenue generation Pakistan, Rs310 billion revenue, Pakistan tax litigation, business community tax challenge, banks Super Tax Pakistan, corporate taxation Pakistan, federal budget Super Tax, economic stabilisation measures Pakistan, Operation Zarb-e-Azb levy, internally displaced persons fund, tax policy Pakistan, constitutional bench Pakistan, Khudayar Mohla

FCC Validates Parliament’s Legislative Competence To Levy Super Tax

ISLAMABAD: While dismissing all pleas challenging legality of the Super Tax on high-income earners, the…

Khudayar Mohla, Islamabad High Court, IHC, Islamabad Local Government elections, local government election petitions, Election Commission of Pakistan, ECP, presidential ordinance, Islamabad Capital Territory, ICT local government, Jamaat-e-Islami, JI, Mohammad Nasrullah Randhawa, Advocate Chaudhry Shoaib Ahmed, local bodies term, constitutional obligation, local government election delay, Islamabad LG polls, ICt Local Government Amendment Ordinance 2026, President Asif Ali Zardari, Articles 17, 32, 89, 140-A, election schedule withdrawal, court adjournment, bench unavailability, deferred hearing, joint petitions, Markazi Muslim League

IHC Adjourns Islamabad LG Election Pleas After Court Roster Cancelled

ISLAMABAD:  A scheduled hearing for the Islamabad Local Government (LG) election petitions was deferred Tuesday…

Khudayar Mohla, Section 4-C, Super Tax Pakistan, Income Tax Ordinance 2001, ITO 2001, Finance Act 2022–23, high-income taxpayers, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR Pakistan, Federal Constitutional Court, FCC Pakistan, government appeals, Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar, constitutional validity, judicial review Pakistan, taxation authority, double taxation, retrospective tax, separation of powers, Pakistan tax law, federal revenue

Levy of Super Tax Within Parliament’s Exclusive Taxing Power, Govt Lawyers Argue Before FCC

ISLAMABAD: A three-member bench of the Chief Justice Federal Constitutional Court Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan is…