Categories Courts

AJK HC Suspends USCP Employees Removal Order

While removing suspension order of more than 50 daily wagers of Utility Stores Corporation of Pakistan, the AJK High Court has decided to adjudicate the plea seeking Corporation employees’ service regularization.

The Utility Stores Corporation of Pakistan (USCP) is a state-owned enterprise – operates chain stores throughout the country that provide basic commodities to the general public at prices which are lower than the open market because the government subsidizes them whereas it has operation in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK).

Filing petition on behalf of his clients, Barrister Syed Abdul Basit Gillani has urged the court to determine legality of the USCP orders saying instead of regularization of these daily wagers employees services, the Corporation has issued removal from services orders.

Editor, Khudayar Mohla, AJK High Court, USCP daily wagers, Utility Stores Corporation Pakistan, employees regularization, USCP removal orders, Barrister Syed Abdul Basit Gillani, Justice Shahid Bahar, National Assembly Standing Committee, court ruling, subsidized commodities, AJK legal news, labor rights, government subsidies, employment law Pakistan, daily wage workers, judicial review
Barrister Syed Abdul Basit Gillani with USCP employees after hearing of the matter

Appearing before single-member bench of the Justice Shahid Bahar, advocates Syed Abdul Basit Gillani and Syed Mazher Azad Gillani argued saying the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Industries and Production in 2017, had issued directives to the USCP to regularize their services after scrutiny and verification at the Zonal Office. Barrister Gillani apprised the court none of the petitioners was regularized. Instead, they were removed from their services. After brief hearing of the arguments, Justice Shahid Bahar of the AJK High Court suspends relieving orders of the petitioners and directed the USCP to restrain from removing any of its daily wage employees. Declaring the employees’ removal orders null and void, the court ruled that “as per the stance of the petitioners, the said orders are liable to set-at-naught.” Later, the court adjourned the case till April 14,2025.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, and Civil and Criminal Law. Contact: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Punjab Judicial Academy, Justice Aalia Neelum, Lahore High Court, PJA Board Meeting, first female Chairperson PJA, judicial training Punjab, judicial reforms Pakistan, Punjab Judicial Academy Act 2007, Section 4 PJA Act, judicial officers training, court personnel training, court management training, case management Punjab, delay reduction techniques, alternate dispute resolution training, judgment writing training, judicial administration Punjab, legal education Pakistan, Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Justice Jawad Hassan, Amjad Iqbal Ranjha, Lahore news, judicial capacity building, Federal Judicial Academy collaboration, legal research Punjab, judicial ethics training, law and development Punjab, legislative drafting training, PJA conferences seminars workshops.

Chief Justice LHC Justice Miss Aalia Neelum Chairs PJA Board Meeting, Marks Historic First for Academy

LAHORE – Days ago the Punjab Judicial Academy marked a significant milestone when Chief Justice…

Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), 27th Constitutional Amendment, FCC commences operations, judicial arena, Islamabad High Court (IHC), FCC judges oath-taking, Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Justice Arshad Hussain Shah, Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan, courtrooms arranged, logistical issues, teething problems, IHC Courtroom No. 2, Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, FCC high-profile cases, amenity plots case, Sindh High Court (SHC) judgment stayed, Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC), public-interest case, IHC relocation, Red Zone difficulties, Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, superior judiciary Pakistan, structural change judicial framework.

Federal Constitutional Court Opens in IHC Building, Ushering in New Post-27th Amendment Judicial Order

ISLAMABAD – The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) finally commenced operations on Monday, marking the first…

Lahore High Court, 27th Constitutional Amendment, challenged, judicial independence, Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Munir Ahmed, Mian Shabbir Ismail, basic structure violation, Supreme Court original jurisdiction, Federal Constitutional Court, abolition of Supreme Court powers, 1973 Constitution, judicial history distortion, compromise of judiciary, legislative transparency, lack of public debate, void amendment, stay on implementation.

Constitutionality of 27th Amendment Challenged in LHC

LAHORE – Invoking jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court – petitioners challenged legality of the…