Categories Courts

Courts Must Exercise Discretion in Favour of Accused on Concurrent Sentences, SC Rules

ISLAMABAD –  The Supreme Court of Pakistan has ruled that courts are empowered to direct that sentences for multiple convictions should run concurrently rather than consecutively. This decision, announced by a three-member bench, emphasizes that judicial discretion should ordinarily be exercised in favor of the accused, especially in case of a minor.
In a reported verdict, the bench, consisting of Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Athar Minallah, and Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan, delivered the verdict in the case of Noor Muhammad etc. v. The State (Jail Petitions Nos. 603/2017, 442/2019, 443/2019 & 444/2019). The case involved a petitioner who had been convicted in three separate cases and was sentenced to multiple prison terms, including life imprisonment.

After the High Court dismissed his appeals, he filed petitions with the apex court. In its analysis, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the principle established in Mst. Shahista Bibi’s case, which held that sentences of imprisonment or life imprisonment, whether from the same trial or separate trials, must run concurrently. The court highlighted that this principle is based on Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
The ruling reasserts the judiciary’s duty to balance penal consequences with fairness, ensuring that punishment for multiple offenses doesn’t become disproportionately harsh. The court stressed that the power to order concurrent sentences under Section 397 CrPC should be used to benefit the accused unless there are exceptional circumstances that warrant otherwise.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner – Mohla & Mohla – Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Pakistan. A Satirist and Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at mohla@lawtoday.com.pk.

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Abher Gul Khan, Sajjad Ali acquittal, murder conviction overturned, reasonable doubt, flawed investigation, evidentiary failures, delayed FIR, post-mortem delay, withholding witnesses, unsubstantiated motive, unreliable testimony, forensic gaps, Khudayar Mohla

LHC Acquits Murder Convict as Prosecution Failed to Prove the Story

LAHORE – A single-member bench of the Lahore High Court comprising Justice Abher Gul Khan,…

Supreme Court of Pakistan, Constitutional Bench, 26th Constitutional Amendment, judicial powers, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Ayesha A Malik, full court, judicial independence, suo motu, Chief Justice of Pakistan, Jawwad S Khawaja, Khawaja Ahmed, constitutional challenge, Article 191A, Parliament, Article 239, Islamabad.

Federation’s Role in 26th Amendment Passage Faces Court Scrutiny

ISLAMABAD – Resuming the hearing in response to over three dozen identical pleas challenging the…

Supreme Court of Pakistan, Public Facilitation Portal, judicial accessibility, online gateway, Chief Justice, Cases Information, Helpline 1818, Applications Status, Early Hearing Requests, Video Link Petitions, Complaints, Anti-Corruption Reporting, Overseas Litigants Portal, justice system, digital transformation

SC Launches ‘Public Facilitation Portal’ to Revolutionize Access to Justice

ISLAMABAD – Taking a significant step toward judicial accessibility, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has…