Categories Courts

Diehard PTI Lawyers and Leaders Meet with CJP

Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Barrister Gohar Ali Khan along with senior party leaders expressed party’s legal and political concerns with Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Justice Yahya Khan Afri­­di at his residence on Friday and sought additional time to review the proposed judicial reforms.

The meeting that lasted aro­u­­nd two hours was part of a broa­der consultation on judicial refor­­ms, as the PTI delegation was in­­vited by the CJP following his me­­­etings with the government side. The delegation comprising lea­der of the opposition in National As­­sembly Omar Ayub Khan, Senator Shibli Faraz, Barrister Ali Zafar, Salman Akram Raja, Dr Babar Awan besides Barrister Gohar, apprised CJP Afridi of the multiple challenges faced by PTI leaders and workers, including ‘unfair jail trials’, and warned that there would be mass protests if justice was not served.

They alleged that cases against PTI leaders were deliberately scheduled at different locations to “hin­­der their ability to appear” in court. The opposition leader said PTI leaders were being subjected to unfair trials where hearings were conducted inside jails. Dr Yasmin Rashid, Ijaz Chaudhary, Umar Cheema, Mian Mehmood Rashid, and Hasan Niazi were ‘falsely implicated’ in multiple cases, he said, asserting that PTI’s legal team was actively contesting these cases in various courts.

The trial of civilians by military courts also came under discussion. While sharing his concerns over enforced disappearances, particularly in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, PTI Secre­­tary General Salman Akram Raja criticised the lack of legal recourse for missing persons and warned that the deteriorating conditions would only encourage separatist sentiments.

Mr Ayub urged the judiciary to assert itself and hold the executive accountable for the alleged martyrdom of PTI workers. However, senior lawyer and PTI leader Sardar Latif Khosa urged CJP Afridi to “put his own house in order”, suggesting internal judicial reforms were necessary. According to a statement issued by the Supreme Court, CJP informed PTI leaders about the upcoming Na­­tional Judicial Policy Making Com­mittee (NJPMC) meeting and his recent meeting with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif who assured full support for the judicial reforms.

CJP Afridi also mentioned the ongoing consultations with bar associations, public representatives, district judiciary, high court registrars, and provincial judicial academies to improve the judicial system. He admitted that there was an urgent need to resolve tax-related cases and reduce overall backlog of cases in the apex court.
He was of the opinion that the proposed judicial reforms could be a “minimum common national agen­­da” supported by all political parties.

Barrister Ali Zafar said the PTI had already provided suggestions to improve the criminal justice system and civil legal procedures. However, he requested additional time to review the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan’s reform proposals before making any recommendations. The chief justice reaffirmed his commitment to ensuring justice and addressing legal concerns raised by PTI leaders.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

1 comment

Malik Muhammad Ali says:

Very Apt term ” diehard”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Khudayar Mohla, Sindh High Court, SHC Karachi, Federal Investigation Agency, FIA Pakistan, Pest Management Services (Private) Limited, Methyl Bromide import, illegal Indian imports, Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho, Enquiry No. ENQ-ACC-KHI-1/26, Imports and Exports (Control) Act 1950, Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974, Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971, Section 160 CrPC, writ petition dismissal, jurisdictional challenge, forged import permits, trade with India, Anti-Corruption Circle Karachi, pesticide import regulations, chemical smuggling investigation, Paras Ali Lodhi, Saddam Hussain Chang, Shazia Hanjra Deputy Attorney General, Department of Plant Protection, Pakistan trade law, industrial chemical enquiry.

SHC Upholds FIA Jurisdiction in Probe into Prohibited Chemical Imports

KARACHI: While dismissing a plea seeking directives against the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), a division…

Khudayar Mohla, Supreme Court Pakistan, Sindh High Court contempt case, contempt of court Pakistan, preliminary hearing requirement, Article 204 Constitution Pakistan, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, Supreme Court verdict 2026, SHC orders set aside, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, Hira Rauf case, Mushtaq Ahmed case Pakistan, procedural law Pakistan, prima facie case law, contempt proceedings Pakistan, judicial procedure Pakistan, intra court appeal Pakistan, legal lapses in court orders, due process in contempt cases, Pakistan judiciary news, Supreme Court rulings Pakistan, constitutional law Pakistan, legal rights of accused contemnor

SC Sets Aside SHC Verdict, Rules Preliminary Hearing Mandatory Before Framing Charge in Contempt Proceedings

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has set aside Sindh High Court orders in a contempt matter,…

khudayar Mohla, Justice Jawad Hassan,Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Sheikh Rasheed Umrah travel ban, Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, LHC Rawalpindi verdict, Anti-Terrorism Court Pakistan, Section 28-A Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, ATA passport impoundment, Justice Jawad Hassan, Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa, Intra Court Appeal Pakistan, ICA No 76 2025, Division Bench LHC, passport impounded by operation of law, freedom of movement Article 15 Constitution Pakistan, reasonable restriction fundamental rights Pakistan, Provincial National Identification List, PNIL Pakistan, Exit Control List Pakistan, ECL Pakistan, no estoppel against law Pakistan, judicial estoppel Pakistan, writ petition LHC, constitutional jurisdiction High Court Pakistan, Additional Attorney General Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency Pakistan, FIA passport impounding, anti-terrorism law Pakistan, charge-sheeted accused travel ban Pakistan, ATC permission travel abroad, Umrah travel permission Pakistan court, legislative intent Section 28-A, mandatory legal presumption ATA, appellate jurisdiction LHC, Law Reforms Ordinance 1972, Pakistan terrorism trial travel restrictions, criminal justice Pakistan, passport impounding terrorism accused, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed court case, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed 2025 2026, LHC sets aside Umrah permission, Pakistan court ruling travel ban, Pakistan High Court anti-terrorism verdict

LHC Rawalpindi Bench Sets Aside Sheikh Rasheed’s Umrah Travel Order, Rules ATC is Sole Authority for Passport Impoundment Under Anti-Terrorism Law

RAWALPINDI: While interpreting the legislative intent behind Section 28-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, read…