Categories Courts

Diehard PTI Lawyers and Leaders Meet with CJP

Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Barrister Gohar Ali Khan along with senior party leaders expressed party’s legal and political concerns with Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Justice Yahya Khan Afri­­di at his residence on Friday and sought additional time to review the proposed judicial reforms.

The meeting that lasted aro­u­­nd two hours was part of a broa­der consultation on judicial refor­­ms, as the PTI delegation was in­­vited by the CJP following his me­­­etings with the government side. The delegation comprising lea­der of the opposition in National As­­sembly Omar Ayub Khan, Senator Shibli Faraz, Barrister Ali Zafar, Salman Akram Raja, Dr Babar Awan besides Barrister Gohar, apprised CJP Afridi of the multiple challenges faced by PTI leaders and workers, including ‘unfair jail trials’, and warned that there would be mass protests if justice was not served.

They alleged that cases against PTI leaders were deliberately scheduled at different locations to “hin­­der their ability to appear” in court. The opposition leader said PTI leaders were being subjected to unfair trials where hearings were conducted inside jails. Dr Yasmin Rashid, Ijaz Chaudhary, Umar Cheema, Mian Mehmood Rashid, and Hasan Niazi were ‘falsely implicated’ in multiple cases, he said, asserting that PTI’s legal team was actively contesting these cases in various courts.

The trial of civilians by military courts also came under discussion. While sharing his concerns over enforced disappearances, particularly in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, PTI Secre­­tary General Salman Akram Raja criticised the lack of legal recourse for missing persons and warned that the deteriorating conditions would only encourage separatist sentiments.

Mr Ayub urged the judiciary to assert itself and hold the executive accountable for the alleged martyrdom of PTI workers. However, senior lawyer and PTI leader Sardar Latif Khosa urged CJP Afridi to “put his own house in order”, suggesting internal judicial reforms were necessary. According to a statement issued by the Supreme Court, CJP informed PTI leaders about the upcoming Na­­tional Judicial Policy Making Com­mittee (NJPMC) meeting and his recent meeting with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif who assured full support for the judicial reforms.

CJP Afridi also mentioned the ongoing consultations with bar associations, public representatives, district judiciary, high court registrars, and provincial judicial academies to improve the judicial system. He admitted that there was an urgent need to resolve tax-related cases and reduce overall backlog of cases in the apex court.
He was of the opinion that the proposed judicial reforms could be a “minimum common national agen­­da” supported by all political parties.

Barrister Ali Zafar said the PTI had already provided suggestions to improve the criminal justice system and civil legal procedures. However, he requested additional time to review the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan’s reform proposals before making any recommendations. The chief justice reaffirmed his commitment to ensuring justice and addressing legal concerns raised by PTI leaders.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, and Civil and Criminal Law. Contact: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

1 comment

Malik Muhammad Ali says:

Very Apt term ” diehard”.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Punjab Judicial Academy, Justice Aalia Neelum, Lahore High Court, PJA Board Meeting, first female Chairperson PJA, judicial training Punjab, judicial reforms Pakistan, Punjab Judicial Academy Act 2007, Section 4 PJA Act, judicial officers training, court personnel training, court management training, case management Punjab, delay reduction techniques, alternate dispute resolution training, judgment writing training, judicial administration Punjab, legal education Pakistan, Sardar Ahmed Naeem, Justice Sajid Mehmood Sethi, Justice Jawad Hassan, Amjad Iqbal Ranjha, Lahore news, judicial capacity building, Federal Judicial Academy collaboration, legal research Punjab, judicial ethics training, law and development Punjab, legislative drafting training, PJA conferences seminars workshops.

Chief Justice LHC Justice Miss Aalia Neelum Chairs PJA Board Meeting, Marks Historic First for Academy

LAHORE – Days ago the Punjab Judicial Academy marked a significant milestone when Chief Justice…

Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), 27th Constitutional Amendment, FCC commences operations, judicial arena, Islamabad High Court (IHC), FCC judges oath-taking, Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Justice Arshad Hussain Shah, Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan, courtrooms arranged, logistical issues, teething problems, IHC Courtroom No. 2, Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, FCC high-profile cases, amenity plots case, Sindh High Court (SHC) judgment stayed, Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC), public-interest case, IHC relocation, Red Zone difficulties, Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, superior judiciary Pakistan, structural change judicial framework.

Federal Constitutional Court Opens in IHC Building, Ushering in New Post-27th Amendment Judicial Order

ISLAMABAD – The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) finally commenced operations on Monday, marking the first…

Lahore High Court, 27th Constitutional Amendment, challenged, judicial independence, Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Munir Ahmed, Mian Shabbir Ismail, basic structure violation, Supreme Court original jurisdiction, Federal Constitutional Court, abolition of Supreme Court powers, 1973 Constitution, judicial history distortion, compromise of judiciary, legislative transparency, lack of public debate, void amendment, stay on implementation.

Constitutionality of 27th Amendment Challenged in LHC

LAHORE – Invoking jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court – petitioners challenged legality of the…