Categories Courts

PHC Stays Appointments of Opposition Leaders in NA, Senate – Seeks Govt Reply

A  division bench of the Peshawar High Court granted stay order to prevent the filling of opposition leader slots in the Parliament.

The directives were issued on Tuesday while the court was hearing pleas challenging disqualificaiton notificaitons of the Election Commission of Pakistan through which Opposition Leader in the National Assembly Omar Ayub and Senator Shibli Faraz were ousted in consequence of conviction in May 9 cases. The court has also sought a comprehensive response from Speaker of the National Assembly, the Chairperson of the Senate, and other respondents by August 15.

On August 5, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) had disqualified Ayub and Faraz, along with other opposition MNAs and MPAs, following their convictions in three cases related to the May 9, 2023 riots.

Subsequently, on August 8, both leaders were removed from their posts via notifications issued by the NA and Senate secretariats. A two-member bench comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Dr Khurshid Iqbal heard petitions filed by both leaders against their de-notification by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

During the hearing, Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, representing the petitioners, argued that the ECP had disqualified the two leaders without receiving a reference from the NA speaker or Senate chairperson, terming it a constitutional overreach.

“ECP acted without authority, until a reference is sent by the speaker, it has no power to disqualify a member,” Gohar argued saying opposition leadership is a constitutional position and, under Assembly rules, cannot be removed through unilateral action by the ECP. Gohar cited a top court ruling to substantiate his argument that the ECP has nothing to do with once a candidate becomes an elected member.

Speaking to media persons outside the court, Barrister Gohar termed the current wave of disqualifications and punishments would not resolve political issues. “Everyone may have made mistakes, but the solution lies in dialogue, not disqualification,” he claimed.

“If the country’s largest party is sidelined, it poses serious risks to democracy.” Gohar also highlighted what he called discriminatory treatment of the PTI, stating that the ECP accepted the intra-party elections of other parties but rejected PTI’s, despite them being conducted in a more transparent manner. He further said that PTI, having won as many s 180 seats in the February 8 general elections, had now been reduced to 76 seats in the Assembly, alleging political victimisation.

Later, the bench adjourned hearing of the matter till August 15.

Author

Khudayar Mohla, Managing Partner Mohla & Mohla, Founder of the Law Today Pakistan,

Managing Partner at Mohla & Mohla - Advocates and Legal Consultants, Islamabad, Founder of The Law Today Pakistan (TLTP) Newswire Service. Former President Press Association of Supreme Court of Pakistan with over two decades of coverage of defining judicial moments - including the dissolution and restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Asif Ali Zardari NAB cases, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani contempt proceedings, Panama Papers case against Mian Nawaz Sharif, matters involving Imran Khan, and the high treason trial of former Army Chief and President Pervez Musharraf. He now practises law and teaches Jurisprudence, International Law, Civil and Criminal Law. Can be reached at: mohla@lawtoday.com.pk

More From Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Lahore High Court, Justice Jawad Hassan, Christian Divorce Act 1869, Pakistan legal news, Shahroz Masih case, minority rights Pakistan, judicial separation Christian law, dissolution of marriage grounds, Section 22 desertion, Section 11 adultery co-respondent, Article 199 writ petition, Article 10-A fair trial, Article 20 religious freedom, Article 4 due process, Mianwali court verdict, substantial justice vs technicalities, irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Punjab Judicial Academy workshops, district judiciary sensitization, matrimonial relief for Christians, evidentiary rigor in divorce cases, legal journalism Pakistan., Khudayar Mohla

LHC Quashes Lower Court Orders on Christian Divorce, Remands the Matter for Re-Adjudication

RAWALPINDI: Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, sets aside concurrent findings…

Khudayar Mohla,Supreme Court of Pakistan, witness box seating, witness dignity Pakistan courts, Article 14 Constitution Pakistan dignity of man, fair trial Article 10A Pakistan, witness protection laws Pakistan, courtroom reforms Pakistan judiciary, Qanun e Shahadat witness examination, Supreme Court directives judiciary Pakistan, witness rights Pakistan courts

SC Directs Courts Nationwide to Provide Seating for Witnesses During Testimony

ISLAMABAD: Emphasizing that justice must be administered with humanity and respect for individual dignity, the…

Khudayar Mohla,Islamabad High Court, IHC, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf, IVY School of Law, IVY College of Management Sciences, Amicus Curiae, Haq Mehr, Dower Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, Shariah Law, Limitation Act 1908, Article 104 Limitation Act, Article 227 Constitution of Pakistan, Women's Financial Rights, Widow Inheritance, West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, Surah An-Nisa, Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, National Commission on the Status of Women, Matrimonial Financial Disputes, Pakistan Legal News, Legislative Reform.

IVY School of Law HoD’s Dr. Zeeshan Ashraf Convinces IHC to Overturn Dower Time-Bar

ISLAMABAD: In a precedent-setting 21-page judgment aimed at harmonizing statutory law with Islamic injunctions, the…